Browse 3,138 peer-reviewed studies on electromagnetic field health effects from the BioInitiative Report database.
Showing 1,453 studies in Cellular Effects
Tang J et al. · 2015
Researchers exposed rats to cell phone radiation (900 MHz) for 28 days and found it damaged the blood-brain barrier, allowing harmful substances to leak into brain tissue and impairing memory. This demonstrates prolonged cell phone exposure can breach the brain's protective defenses.
Narayanan SN, Kumar RS, Karun KM, Nayak SB, Bhat PG · 2015
Researchers exposed young rats to cell phone-level radiation (900 MHz) for one hour daily over 28 days, then tested their ability to navigate a water maze and examined their brain tissue. The exposed rats showed impaired learning and memory retention, along with measurable damage to brain cells in the hippocampus (the brain's memory center), including reduced cell survival and altered nerve cell structure.
Lee D, Lee J, Lee I. · 2015
Researchers exposed guppies and zebrafish to cell phone radiation (1800 MHz) for 3 minutes and tracked their swimming behavior. They found that fed fish showed significant changes in their movement patterns and swimming speed when exposed to the RF EMF, while hungry fish showed no changes. The study ruled out temperature effects, confirming the behavioral changes were due to the electromagnetic field itself.
Bodera P et al. · 2015
Researchers exposed rats to 1800 MHz radiofrequency radiation (the same frequency used in cell phones) for 15 minutes, five times daily, and measured oxidative damage in their organs. They found increased lipid peroxidation (cellular damage from oxidation) in the brain, blood, and kidneys of exposed animals. This suggests that repeated cell phone-frequency radiation exposure may cause oxidative stress damage to vital organs.
Souza LD, Cerqueira ED, Meireles JR · 2014
Brazilian researchers examined cells from the mouths of 45 mobile phone users to look for DNA damage and cell death markers. They found no differences in most cellular damage markers between light, moderate, and heavy phone users (more than 5 hours per week). However, heavy users showed significantly more 'broken egg' structures in their cells, which may indicate gene amplification problems.
Senavirathna MD, Asaeda T, Thilakarathne BL, Kadono H · 2014
Researchers exposed aquatic plants to 2 GHz radio frequency radiation (similar to cell phone signals) for one hour and measured ultra-precise changes in how the plants grew. The radiation significantly altered the plants' natural growth patterns by 51%, and these changes persisted for at least 2.5 hours after exposure ended. This demonstrates that RF radiation can affect living organisms through non-thermal mechanisms, even in plants.
Rougier C, Prorot A, Chazal P, Leveque P, Leprat P · 2014
Researchers exposed E. coli bacteria to 2.45 GHz microwave radiation (the same frequency used in microwave ovens and WiFi) at various power levels while keeping the temperature constant at body temperature. They found that higher power levels (400-2000 watts) caused slight damage to bacterial cell membranes, even though the temperature wasn't hot enough to explain this damage through heating alone. This suggests microwave radiation may have biological effects beyond just heating.
Lee SS, Kim HR, Kim MS, Park S, Yoon ES, Park SH, Kim DW. · 2014
Researchers exposed fat-derived stem cells to Wi-Fi signals from smartphones uploading data for 10 hours daily over 5 days to test for harmful effects. They found no damage to the cells - no increased cell death, no changes in growth factors, and no other signs of harm from the electromagnetic signals. The only effect was slightly increased cell growth, which the researchers attributed to heat from the phone rather than the Wi-Fi radiation itself.
de Souza FT et al. · 2014
Researchers studied whether cell phone use causes stress-related changes in the parotid salivary glands (located near the ear where phones are held) by comparing saliva from 62 people's exposed and unexposed glands. They found no differences in cellular stress markers, protein levels, or salivary flow between the phone-exposed side and the opposite side, even when accounting for years of use or calling time.
de Groot MW, Kock MD, Westerink RH. · 2014
Researchers exposed nerve cells (PC12 cells) to 50 Hz magnetic fields at extremely high levels - up to 1000 microteslas, which is 10,000 times stronger than typical background exposure. They tested both healthy cells and chemically-stressed cells that were more vulnerable to damage. The study found no toxic effects on the nerve cells' calcium balance, oxidative stress levels, or cell membrane integrity, even at these extraordinarily high exposure levels.
Khalil AM, Abu Khadra KM, Aljaberi AM, Gagaa MH, Issa HS. · 2014
Researchers measured oxidative stress markers in saliva from people before, during, and after 15-30 minute cell phone calls to see if radiofrequency radiation causes cellular damage. They found no significant changes in any of the stress markers or antioxidant levels, suggesting that short-term phone use doesn't trigger detectable oxidative stress in saliva.
Furtado-Filho OV et al. · 2014
Brazilian researchers exposed young rats to cell phone-level radiation (950 MHz) for 30 minutes daily, starting before birth and continuing up to 30 days after birth. They found no evidence of oxidative stress or DNA damage in most age groups, though 30-day-old rats showed some genetic changes and newborns had altered fatty acid levels in their livers. The study suggests that developing animals may be more resilient to short-term RF radiation exposure than previously thought.
de Souza FT et al. · 2014
Researchers examined saliva from 62 people to see if cell phone radiation causes cellular stress in the parotid glands (the largest salivary glands near your ears). They compared saliva from the gland on the same side as phone use to the opposite side, measuring stress markers like proteins and antioxidants. No differences were found between the exposed and unexposed sides, suggesting cell phone radiation doesn't cause detectable cellular stress in these glands.
Yoon HE, Lee JS, Myung SH, Lee YS · 2014
Researchers exposed human lung cells to 60-Hz magnetic fields at different strengths and measured DNA damage markers. They found that stronger magnetic fields (2 mT) caused DNA damage on their own and made cells more vulnerable to radiation damage, while weaker fields (1 mT) had no effect. This suggests that power-frequency magnetic fields can damage DNA at high enough levels.
Jin YB et al. · 2014
Researchers exposed four different types of human and mouse cells to 60 Hz magnetic fields (the same frequency as power lines) for 4 to 16 hours, both alone and combined with known DNA-damaging agents like radiation and hydrogen peroxide. They found no DNA damage from the magnetic field exposure alone, and the magnetic fields did not make other DNA-damaging agents more harmful. This suggests that power-frequency magnetic fields at 1 milliTesla may not directly damage cellular DNA.
de Groot MW, Kock MD, Westerink RH. · 2014
Researchers exposed nerve cells (PC12 cells) to 50 Hz magnetic fields at levels up to 1,000 microtesla for periods ranging from 30 minutes to 48 hours. They tested both healthy cells and chemically-stressed cells that were more vulnerable to damage. The magnetic field exposure caused no detectable effects on calcium levels, cellular damage, or oxidative stress in either type of cell.
Alcaraz M, Olmos E, Alcaraz-Saura M, Achel DG, Castillo J. · 2014
Researchers exposed mice to 50 Hz magnetic fields (the same frequency as power lines) for up to 28 days and found evidence of genetic damage in bone marrow cells. The magnetic field exposure caused an increase in micronucleated cells, which are markers of DNA damage, though the effect was less than X-ray radiation. Importantly, antioxidants that protect against radiation damage did not protect against the magnetic field damage, suggesting different biological mechanisms.
de Groot MW, Kock MD, Westerink RH. · 2014
Dutch researchers exposed nerve cells (PC12 cells) to 50 Hz magnetic fields at levels up to 1,000 microtesla for periods ranging from 30 minutes to 48 hours. They found no effects on calcium levels, oxidative stress, or cell membrane integrity, even in cells that had been chemically stressed to make them more vulnerable. The exposure levels were 10,000 times higher than typical background magnetic field exposure.
Kang KA et al. · 2014
Researchers exposed neuronal brain cells to combined cell phone radiation (CDMA and WCDMA signals) for 2 hours to measure whether this caused oxidative stress, a type of cellular damage linked to various health problems. The study found no increase in reactive oxygen species (cellular damage markers) in any of the three types of brain cells tested, even when combined with known oxidative stress agents.
Zhang X, Gao Y, Dong J, Wang S, Yao B, et al. (2014) · 2014
Chinese researchers exposed 100 rats to high-power microwave radiation and found significant heart damage, including abnormal heart rhythms, cellular swelling, and damaged mitochondria (the cell's powerhouses). When they treated some rats with a traditional Chinese herbal compound called Kang Fu Ling, the heart damage was largely prevented. This suggests that microwave radiation can harm the cardiovascular system at the cellular level.
Vereshchako GG, Chueshova NV, Gorokh GA, Naumov AD. · 2014
Russian researchers exposed pregnant rats and their male offspring to cell phone radiation (897 MHz) for 8 hours daily throughout pregnancy and early development. The exposed male rats showed accelerated sexual development, disrupted sperm production with abnormal cell counts at different stages, and decreased sperm viability despite having more mature sperm overall. This suggests that EMF exposure during critical developmental periods can cause lasting reproductive damage that persists into adulthood.
Ulubay M et al. · 2014
Researchers exposed pregnant rats to 900 MHz radiofrequency radiation (the same frequency used by many cell phones) and examined the kidneys of their offspring at four weeks old. They found that prenatal EMF exposure caused the kidneys to grow larger but have fewer filtering units called glomeruli, which are essential for proper kidney function. Importantly, giving the mothers melatonin or omega-3 supplements during pregnancy prevented these harmful effects.
Tök L, Nazıroğlu M, Doğan S, Kahya MC, Tök O. · 2014
Turkish researchers exposed rats to Wi-Fi radiation (2.45 GHz) for one hour daily over 30 days and found it caused oxidative stress in the eye lens, similar to cellular damage from aging or toxins. When rats were given melatonin supplements, the antioxidant significantly reduced this Wi-Fi-induced damage. This suggests that common Wi-Fi exposure may harm delicate eye tissues, but natural protective compounds could help defend against such effects.
Soran ML, Stan M, Niinemets U, Copolovici L · 2014
Researchers exposed three common aromatic plants (parsley, celery, and dill) to microwave radiation at frequencies used by WiFi routers and cell phones. The plants showed cellular damage including thinner cell walls and smaller organelles, along with increased release of volatile compounds. This demonstrates that everyday wireless device frequencies can act as environmental stressors on plant life.
Sepehrimanesh M et al. · 2014
Researchers exposed male rats to 900 MHz radiofrequency radiation (the same frequency used by many cell phones) for 1, 2, or 4 hours daily over 30 days. Rats exposed for 4 hours daily showed significantly decreased testosterone levels and disrupted reproductive hormones compared to unexposed rats. This suggests that prolonged RF exposure may interfere with male fertility and reproductive function.