Browse 3,138 peer-reviewed studies on electromagnetic field health effects from the BioInitiative Report database.
Showing 1,359 studies (Human Studies)
Sirav B, Seyhan N · 2009
Researchers exposed rats to 900 MHz cell phone radiation for 20 minutes and found it made the blood-brain barrier more permeable in males but not females. This protective brain barrier normally keeps toxins out, suggesting cell phone radiation might compromise brain protection.
Nittby H et al. · 2009
Researchers exposed rats to cell phone radiation at various power levels for 2 hours, then examined their brains 7 days later. They found that the blood-brain barrier (the protective shield that normally keeps toxins out of the brain) became more permeable, allowing proteins to leak into brain tissue. This suggests that even a single exposure to cell phone radiation can compromise the brain's protective barrier for at least a week.
Luukkonen J et al. · 2009
Researchers exposed human brain cells to radiofrequency radiation at 872 MHz (similar to older cell phone frequencies) combined with a chemical that creates cellular damage. They found that continuous wave RF radiation at high intensity (5 W/kg SAR) increased both harmful oxygen molecules and DNA damage compared to the chemical alone. Interestingly, pulsed signals like those used in GSM phones showed no such effects, even at the same power level.
De Iuliis GN, Newey RJ, King BV, Aitken RJ. · 2009
Researchers exposed human sperm cells to radiofrequency radiation at the same frequency used by mobile phones (1.8 GHz) for 24 hours in laboratory conditions. They found that as radiation levels increased, sperm became less mobile and viable, while also showing increased DNA damage and harmful cellular stress. This suggests that mobile phone radiation could potentially affect male fertility and even the health of future children.
Valbonesi P et al. · 2008
Researchers exposed human placental cells to cell phone radiation (1.8 GHz GSM signals) for one hour at levels twice the current safety limit to see if it would trigger cellular stress responses or DNA damage. The radiation exposure produced no detectable effects on stress proteins or DNA integrity, unlike positive control treatments that did cause measurable damage. This suggests that short-term exposure to this type of cell phone radiation may not immediately harm these particular cells.
Unterlechner M, Sauter C, Schmid G, Zeitlhofer J. · 2008
Researchers exposed 40 healthy volunteers to UMTS mobile phone-like electromagnetic fields at 1.97 GHz while testing their attention and reaction time on computer tasks. The study found no statistically significant effects on cognitive performance, even at exposure levels up to 1.49 W/kg SAR (specific absorption rate, a measure of how much energy the body absorbs). This suggests that short-term exposure to 3G mobile phone signals does not immediately impair basic cognitive functions like attention and reaction speed.
Tokola K, Kurttio P, Salminen T, Auvinen A. · 2008
Researchers compared what 70 people said about their cell phone use in interviews versus actual usage data from phone companies. They found people consistently overestimated how much they used their phones, reporting about twice as much talk time as the records showed. This matters because most studies on cell phone health effects rely on people accurately remembering and reporting their usage, which this study shows they don't do well.
Sadetzki S et al. · 2008
Israeli researchers studied 460 people with parotid gland tumors (located near the ear) and compared their cell phone use to 1,266 healthy controls. While overall cell phone use didn't increase tumor risk, heavy users who held phones directly to their heads showed a 58% higher risk of developing tumors on the same side where they used their phone. This suggests that intensive cell phone use without hands-free devices may increase risk of tumors in glands near where the phone is held.
Riddervold IS et al. · 2008
Danish researchers tested whether 45-minute exposures to UMTS cell tower radiation (2140 MHz) affected cognitive performance and symptoms in 40 teenagers and 40 adults. They found no significant differences in cognitive test performance between real and sham exposures, though participants reported slightly more headaches during radiation exposure, which may have been due to baseline differences rather than the radiation itself.
Nieto-Hernandez R et al. · 2008
Researchers tested whether people claiming sensitivity to mobile phone signals could actually detect when phones were on versus off, then told participants their results to see if accurate feedback would change their symptoms. Even when told they couldn't actually detect phone signals, participants' sensitivity symptoms and beliefs remained unchanged six months later. The study suggests that providing scientific evidence alone may not be enough to help people with electromagnetic hypersensitivity reconsider their symptoms.
Manti L et al. · 2008
Italian researchers exposed human blood cells to cell phone radiation (1.95 GHz UMTS signal) for 24 hours, then hit them with X-rays to see if the RF exposure made the radiation damage worse. While the cell phone signals didn't increase the number of damaged cells, they did cause a small but measurable increase in the severity of chromosome damage within each affected cell at the higher exposure level (2.0 W/kg SAR). This suggests RF radiation might interfere with the cell's ability to repair DNA damage from other sources.
Lerchl A et al. · 2008
German researchers exposed hamsters to cell phone radiation 24 hours a day for 60 days at levels matching the maximum allowed for humans. While melatonin levels (the sleep hormone) remained unchanged, hamsters exposed to certain frequencies gained up to 6% more body weight than unexposed animals, suggesting the radiation may affect metabolism even at supposedly safe levels.
Lahkola A et al. · 2008
Researchers studied 1,209 people with meningiomas (a type of brain tumor) and 3,299 healthy controls across five European countries to see if mobile phone use increases tumor risk. They found that regular mobile phone users actually had a 24% lower risk of developing meningiomas compared to non-users or occasional users. The study found no increased risk regardless of how long people used phones, how many calls they made, or what type of network they used.
Kleinlogel H et al. · 2008
Researchers tested whether cell phone radiation from GSM and UMTS networks affects brain activity and cognitive performance in 15 healthy adults. They measured brain waves and reaction times during various mental tasks while participants were exposed to phone radiation at levels typical of actual phone use. The study found no significant changes in brain activity or cognitive function during EMF exposure compared to fake (sham) exposure.
Kleinlogel H et al. · 2008
Researchers exposed 15 healthy adults to electromagnetic fields from both GSM (2G) and UMTS (3G) mobile phones while measuring their brain activity with EEG and asking about their well-being. They found no significant changes in brain wave patterns or reported symptoms compared to fake (sham) exposure. The study suggests that typical mobile phone radiation levels don't produce detectable immediate effects on brain activity in healthy users.
Kim DW, Lee JH, Ji HC, Kim SC, Nam KC, Cha EJ. · 2008
Researchers exposed 18 people who claimed electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) and 19 healthy controls to both real and fake cell phone radiation from a CDMA phone for 30 minutes each. They measured heart rate, breathing rate, and heart rate variability to see if the radiation caused physical changes. The study found no measurable differences in any of these body functions between real and fake exposure in either group.
Johansson A et al. · 2008
Swedish researchers exposed 15 people with atopic dermatitis (a chronic skin condition causing inflammation and itching) to 30 minutes of cell phone-like radiofrequency radiation at 1 W/kg and measured blood markers of inflammation and stress. They found no changes in any of the measured substances compared to sham exposure, suggesting that RF exposure at typical cell phone levels does not trigger inflammatory responses in people with this sensitive skin condition.
Huang TQ, Lee MS, Oh E, Zhang BT, Seo JS, Park WY. · 2008
Researchers exposed immune system T-cells to cell phone radiation at 1763 MHz for 24 hours to see if it caused cellular damage or changes in gene activity. They found no significant effects on cell growth, DNA damage, or major gene expression changes, though two immune-related genes showed minor decreases. This suggests that 24-hour exposure to this specific frequency at high power levels did not cause detectable harm to these immune cells.
Franzellitti S, Valbonesi P, Contin A, Biondi C, Fabbri E. · 2008
Researchers exposed human placental cells to 1.8 GHz mobile phone radiation for up to 24 hours to study stress protein responses. While the cells showed no changes in stress proteins at the protein level, they found subtle changes in genetic activity (mRNA) that varied depending on the type of signal modulation used. This suggests that cellular responses to RF radiation may be more complex and nuanced than previously detected.
Falzone N et al. · 2008
Researchers exposed human sperm samples to cell phone radiation at two different intensities to see if it affected sperm health and movement. They found no effects at the lower intensity (similar to normal phone use), but at the higher intensity, sperm swimming patterns became impaired over time. This suggests that stronger EMF exposures may harm male fertility, though typical phone use levels showed no immediate damage.
Djeridane Y, Touitou Y, de Seze R. · 2008
French researchers exposed 20 healthy men to 900 MHz cell phone radiation for 2 hours daily over 4 weeks and measured their hormone levels around the clock. They found temporary decreases in growth hormone (28%) and cortisol (12%) during exposure, but these changes disappeared after stopping exposure and all hormone levels stayed within normal ranges. The study suggests that typical cell phone use may cause minor, reversible changes to certain hormones but doesn't disrupt the body's overall hormone system.
Dasdag S, Akdag MZ, Ulukaya E, Uzunlar AK, Yegin D. · 2008
Researchers exposed male rats to 900 MHz cell phone radiation for 2 hours daily over 10 months to see if it would trigger cell death (apoptosis) in sperm-producing cells. They found no significant increase in cell death markers in the testes of exposed rats compared to unexposed controls. This suggests that this level of cell phone radiation exposure may not directly damage sperm production through cell death pathways.
Cinel C, Russo R, Boldini A, Fox E. · 2008
Researchers exposed 496 volunteers to mobile phone radiation in a controlled, double-blind study to see if it caused symptoms like headaches or dizziness. They found only one inconsistent effect - dizziness in one group that wasn't replicated in the other groups. The study concluded there's no consistent evidence that mobile phone radiation causes immediate physical symptoms.
Bamiou DE, Ceranic B, Cox R, Watt H, Chadwick P, Luxon LM. · 2008
Researchers tested whether 30-minute mobile phone exposures affect inner ear function in 9 people who reported symptoms from phone use and 21 healthy controls. Using precise hearing and balance tests before and after exposure to 882 MHz radiation at typical phone power levels, they found no measurable changes in either group. This suggests that short-term mobile phone use doesn't immediately impair the ear's delicate hearing or balance mechanisms.
Unterlechner M, Sauter C, Schmid G, Zeitlhofer J · 2008
Researchers exposed 40 healthy adults to 3G mobile phone signals at 1.97 GHz for 90 minutes while testing their attention and reaction time through computer tasks. The study found no immediate effects on cognitive performance at exposure levels up to 0.63 W/kg SAR (specific absorption rate), which represents the amount of RF energy absorbed by brain tissue. This suggests that short-term exposure to 3G phone signals does not impair basic mental functions like attention and reaction speed.