EXTRACORPOREAL HEMOLYSIS OF BLOOD IN A MICROWAVE BLOOD WARMER
Parker J. Staples, Paul F. Griner · 1971
Browse 6,486 peer-reviewed studies on electromagnetic field health effects from 4 research libraries.
Showing all 6,486 studies
Parker J. Staples, Paul F. Griner · 1971
S. Baranski · 1971
Researchers exposed 100 guinea pigs and 100 rabbits to continuous or pulsed 10 cm microwaves at 3.5 mW/cm power density for 3 hours daily over 3 months. Peripheral blood, bone marrow, lymph nodes, and spleen were examined. Bone marrow erythroblasts showed abnormal chromatin structure, karyolysis, nuclear fragmentation, and abnormal mitoses with chromosomal bridges and clumping; identical abnormalities appeared in lymphocytes of spleen and lymph nodes.
Harold L. Bassett et al. · 1971
The focused prolate spheroid uses a waveguide feed at one focus and places the biological sample at the other focus to achieve large power densities over about one square wavelength. The absorber-lined horn acts as a small source within an anechoic chamber that reduces errors due to interaction with the biological sample. The compact range employs a reflector and feed system to generate a plane wave across a large aperture for illuminating large volumes. All three systems can be implemented in a limited space without an anechoic chamber, and experimental data from model systems are presented.
A. F. Klascius · 1971
McRee D, Walsh P · 1971
The system uses a Litton Power Pak magnetron with a continuous-wave output of 0.5-1.5 kW and an absorber-lined horn to produce a uniform field near the horn aperture. Field calibration showed variations of approximately +5% over a 15 cm square area, +10% over a 24 cm square area, and +15% over a 32 cm square area at 61 cm from the horn. The presence of specimens did not alter the power output, and no reflected power was measurable at 200 mW//cm!.
Ismailov ESH · 1971
C. K. O'BRIEN, A. W. RICHARDSON, H. M. KAPLAN · 1971
R. I. GRAY, C. E. GALLAHER · 1971
Jerzy Tajchert, Eustachy Chmurko · 1971
M. A. Henderson · 1971
David H. Aronofsky · 1971
George M. Samaras, Lawrence R. Muroff, George E. Anderson · 1971
Wilbert Shimoda · 1971
J.A. Tanner, C. Romero-Sierra · 1971
Brady, M.M. · 1971
C. L. Schepens, M.D. · 1971
Unknown authors · 1971
The review noted that literature on magnetic field biological effects had increased dramatically during the last decade. Many studies reported subjective effects like fatigue and irritability, but these were difficult to assess quantitatively. The literature was described as extensive and often contradictory, with some studies finding effects on cellular systems while others found none. Only one review (Ketchen, Porter and Bolten 1978) proposed a human exposure limit of 0.02 Tesla for continuous static magnetic field exposure. Other reviews concluded that data inadequacies did not allow informed statements about permissible exposure levels.
G. Bertharion, B. Servantie, R. Joly · 1971
Yu. A. Kholodov, Yu. I. Novitsky · 1971
They identified several problem areas for the geomagnetic field's biological significance, including orientation, magnetic anomalies, ontogenesis, hypomagnetic syndrome, and sensitivity mechanisms. The authors concluded that no mechanism for weak-field perception had been demonstrated, including hypothesized membrane mechanisms or intracellular magnetic fields.
Arthur W. Guy · 1971
The method uses a thermograph camera to record temperature distributions from energy absorption in phantom models that match tissue dielectric and geometric properties. Electric field magnitude is derived from the square root of the calculated heating pattern. The technique was validated by comparing experimental results with theoretical results for plane layers exposed to a rectangular-aperture source and cylindrical layers exposed to a plane-wave source.
B. И. Банъков · 1971
Michael J. Schmidt, Dennis E. Sokoloff, G. Alan Robison · 1971
Miles F. Buchman · 1971
Joseph C. Sharp, Carl J. Paperiello · 1971
Stephen W. Smith, David G. Brown · 1971