Liu T, Wang S, He L, Ye K. · 2008
The study investigated whether anxiety levels could be affected by repeated extremely low frequency magnetic field (ELF MF) exposure of different daily durations. Rats exposed for 4 h/day showed increased anxiety-like behaviors in the open field test and the elevated plus maze test, without changes in locomotor activity, but showed no effect in the light/dark box test. Rats exposed for 1 h/day showed no effect in any of the tests.
Liu T, Wang S, He L, Ye K. · 2008
Researchers tested spatial learning and memory in rats using the Morris water maze after four weeks of daily exposure to a 50-Hz magnetic field of 2 mT for either one or four hours. Chronic exposure reduced the time rats took to find a hidden platform and improved long-term memory of the platform's former location. Short-term memory and motor activity were not affected.
Wang X et al. · 2008
Researchers exposed rats to extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields (20 Hz, 14 mT) for one hour per day before daily morphine injections for 12 days, then measured dopamine D2 receptor density in the dorsal hippocampus during withdrawal. Morphine withdrawal alone significantly lowered D2 receptor density compared to saline controls, and ELF-EMF exposure during morphine treatment further reduced receptor density on the first and third withdrawal days. In both groups, D2 receptor density tended to recover as the number of withdrawal days increased.
Canseven AG, Coskun S, Seyhan N · 2008
Researchers exposed guinea pigs to 50 Hz magnetic fields at 1, 2, and 3 mT for 4 h/day and 8 h/day for 5 days, measuring malondialdehyde, nitric oxide, glutathione, and myeloperoxidase activity in heart and liver tissues. MDA levels increased in the liver in some groups but decreased in both liver and heart in group VII. The researchers concluded that field intensity and exposure duration are among the conditions that influence free radical formation and antioxidant enzyme behavior.
Erdal N, Gürgül S, Tamer L, Ayaz L · 2008
Researchers exposed adult Wistar-Albino rats to an extremely low frequency magnetic field (50 Hz, 1 mT, 4 hours per day) to study oxidative and nitrosative stress in liver tissue. 3-nitrotyrosine (3-NT) levels were significantly increased in exposed female rats compared to female controls, but no significant difference was found between exposed and control male rats. Malondialdehyde (MDA) levels showed no significant differences between control and exposed rats in either sex.
Falone S et al. · 2008
Italian researchers exposed young and older rats to 50 Hz magnetic fields from power lines for 10 days. Young rats strengthened their brain's antioxidant defenses, but older rats experienced significant weakening of these protective systems, suggesting aging brains are more vulnerable to EMF damage.
Hashish AH, El-Missiry MA, Abdelkader HI, Abou-Saleh RH · 2008
Ahmed Z, Wieraszko A. · 2008
Researchers exposed brain tissue from the hippocampus (memory center) to pulsed magnetic fields for 30 minutes. The neurons became significantly more electrically active, firing more signals and changing how they communicate. This shows magnetic fields can directly alter brain cell function.
Hashish AH, El-Missiry MA, Abdelkader HI, Abou-Saleh RH. · 2008
Researchers exposed mice to magnetic fields and 50 Hz electromagnetic fields (the type from power lines) for 30 days to study health effects. The exposed mice lost weight and showed signs of liver stress, including increased oxidative damage (cellular damage from unstable molecules) and changes in blood chemistry. The study suggests that prolonged exposure to these common electromagnetic fields may disrupt the body's ability to protect itself from cellular damage.
Unknown authors · 2008
Researchers recorded TEOAEs in 27 healthy young adults before and after 10 minutes of real or sham GSM exposure in a double-blind design. TEOAE data were analyzed both globally using broadband analysis and with wavelet transform for time-frequency fine structure. Both analyses revealed no significant effect of exposure on TEOAEs.
Unknown authors · 2008
Researchers exposed cultured human lens epithelial cells to 0.4 mT 50 Hz magnetic fields for 2, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours. After exposure, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and stained for gamma H2AX immunofluorescence, and foci were counted in at least 200 cells per sample. Cells with more than three foci per cell were classified as positive, and mean foci per cell and percentage of positive cells were used as indexes of DNA double-strand breaks. Exposure for 24 hours significantly increased mean foci per cell to 2.93 and positive cells to 27.88% compared with sham (1.77 and 19.38%, P<0.05), and exposure for 48 hours increased them to 3.14 and 31.00% (P<0.01), while 2, 6, and 12 hour exposures showed no significant difference (P>0.05).
Zhao TY, Zou SP, Knapp PE · 2007
Researchers exposed brain cells (neurons and astrocytes) to radiation from a working GSM cell phone for just 2 hours and found that genes involved in cell death pathways became more active. The effect occurred even when the phone was on standby mode, and neurons appeared more sensitive to the radiation than astrocytes (support cells in the brain). This suggests that even brief cell phone exposure can trigger cellular stress responses in brain tissue.
Peyman A, Holden SJ, Watts S, Perrott R, Gabriel C · 2007
The dielectric properties of pig cerebrospinal tissues were measured in vivo and in vitro in the frequency range of 50 MHz-20 GHz. White matter and spinal cord showed significant variation as a function of animal age while no age-related variations were recorded for grey matter. The in vitro study included tissue from pigs weighing approximately 10, 50, and 250 kg to examine variation with age. Total combined measurement uncertainty was calculated at each frequency point and reported over representative frequency regions. Comparisons were made between the in vivo and in vitro data and with literature from the past decade.
Unknown authors · 2007
Researchers measured radiofrequency fields from wireless local area networks using Wi-Fi technology against background RF fields in the frequency range 75 MHz to 3 GHz. They conducted 356 measurements at 55 sites including residences, commercial spaces, healthcare and educational institutions, and other public spaces in the U.S., France, Germany, and Sweden. Measurements were taken under conditions that would result in the higher end of exposures, including close to Wi-Fi access points and at a distance of approximately 1 m from a laptop uploading and downloading large files. In all cases, measured Wi-Fi signal levels were very far below international exposure limits (IEEE C95.1-2005 and ICNIRP) and in nearly all cases far below other RF signals in the same environments.
Vecchio F et al. · 2007
Italian researchers exposed 10 people to cell phone radiation for 45 minutes while measuring their brain waves with EEG technology. They found that the radiation altered how the left and right sides of the brain communicate with each other, specifically disrupting the synchronization of alpha brain waves that are important for information processing. This suggests that cell phone emissions don't just affect individual brain cells, but can interfere with the coordinated electrical activity between different brain regions.
Krause CM, Pesonen M, Haarala Bjornberg C, Hamalainen H. · 2007
Researchers recruited two groups of 36 male participants each, one performing an auditory memory task and the other a visual working memory task under six exposure conditions. The study aimed to partially replicate earlier work and investigate effects of mobile phone EMF on event-related desynchronisation/synchronisation EEG responses during cognitive processing. EMF exposure produced modest effects on alpha band oscillatory responses but no effects on behavioural measures. The EEG effects were varying, unsystematic, and inconsistent with previous reports.
Dimbylow P. · 2007
Researchers used finite-difference time-domain calculations to estimate SAR from 20 MHz to 3 GHz in hybrid voxel-mathematical models of the pregnant female. Mathematical models of the developing foetus at 8-, 13-, 26- and 38-week gestation were converted into voxels and combined with the reference adult female model, NAOMI at a resolution of 2 mm. The study calculated the electric field values needed to produce the ICNIRP public exposure restriction of 2 W kg(-1) when averaged over 10 g of the foetus.
Unknown authors · 2007
Researchers developed an anatomical voxel model of an 89 kg woman at 30 weeks pregnancy to study low frequency field exposure. They calculated intracorporal electric current density distributions from homogeneous 50 Hz electric and magnetic fields and compared them to ICNIRP basic restrictions. The basic restriction was met in the mother's central nervous system at reference level exposure. However, the basic restriction was considerably exceeded in the fetus. The authors suggest revision of reference levels might be necessary.
Unknown authors · 2007
Researchers exposed UVW human glioma cells to ELF-EMF at 1 mT (50 Hz) for 12 hours. This exposure alone produced 0.011 mutations per locus per cell, a 3.75-fold increase over unexposed controls. ELF-EMF also increased the mutagenic effect of 0.3 Gy and 3 Gy gamma-irradiation by 2.6-fold and 2.75-fold respectively. The lower radiation dose of 0.3 Gy induced more than 10 times more mutations per unit dose than 3 Gy, indicating hypermutability at low dose.
Unknown authors · 2007
Researchers exposed Wistar rats to a 50 Hz, 1 mT magnetic field for either 4 hours (acute) or 4 hours per day for 45 days (long-term). Chromosomal aberration analysis showed no statistically significant differences between exposed and control groups. However, the long-term exposure group had a significantly higher micronucleus frequency than controls (p<0.01). Both acute and long-term exposure significantly reduced the mitotic index (p<0.001 and p<0.01) and the PCE/NCE ratio (p<0.001 and p<0.01).
Jadidi M et al. · 2007
Researchers exposed rats to 50 Hz magnetic fields (household electricity frequency) immediately after learning a maze. An 8 milliTesla field for 20 minutes disrupted memory formation when applied right after learning, suggesting magnetic fields can interfere with how brains consolidate new memories.
Unknown authors · 2007
Researchers investigated 196 homes from the UK Childhood Cancer Study, including 102 with estimated exposures above 0.2 microT and 21 above 0.4 microT. Surveys were conducted outside all 196 properties and indoor assessments were completed in 19 homes where consent was obtained. Low-voltage sources linked to net currents in circuits inside or around the home were the main contributors to elevated exposures.
Hirose H et al. · 2007
Researchers performed an in vitro study of low-level RF fields from IMT-2000 base stations to test if modulated signals cause hsp27 phosphorylation and overexpression. No significant differences in phosphorylated hsp27 at serine 82 or in hsp gene expression were found between exposed and sham-exposed groups.
Hirose H et al. · 2007
Japanese researchers exposed human brain and lung cells to radiofrequency radiation at levels similar to cell tower emissions (2.1 GHz) for up to 48 hours. They found no changes in heat shock proteins (cellular stress markers that increase when cells are damaged) even at exposure levels 10 times higher than public safety limits. This suggests that cell tower-level RF radiation does not trigger detectable cellular stress responses in laboratory conditions.
Unknown authors · 2007
The paper discusses the phenomenon, mechanism, power requirement, pressure amplitude, and auditory thresholds of microwave hearing. Microwave pulse hearing involves electromagnetic waves from hundreds of MHz to tens of GHz, unlike normal hearing which uses sound pressure waves. The microwave auditory effect does not come from direct interaction with auditory nerves but from a thermoelastic wave launched by pulse absorption in soft tissues. This thermoelastic wave travels by bone conduction to the inner ear and activates cochlear receptors like normal hearing. The paper emphasizes human exposures to wireless communication fields and MRI coils.
