Sharma A, Sisodia R, Bhatnagar D, Saxena VK · 2013
Researchers exposed Swiss albino mice to 10 GHz microwaves at a power density of 0.25 mW/cm2 for 2 hours per day for 30 days, then tested spatial memory using the Morris water maze test. Exposed mice showed statistically significant higher mean latency to reach the target quadrant compared to sham-exposed mice. A decrease in protein levels was also estimated in the whole brain of exposed mice compared to sham-exposed mice.
Pelletier A et al. · 2013
Researchers examined the effects of chronic RF-EMF exposure (900 MHz, 1 V m(-1)) on the main functions involved in body energy homeostasis, including feeding behaviour, sleep, and thermoregulatory processes. Thirteen juvenile male Wistar rats were exposed to continuous RF-EMF for 5 weeks and compared with 11 non-exposed animals. The frequency of rapid eye movement sleep episodes was greater in the exposed group independently of ambient temperature, with increases of 42.1% at 24 °C and 31.6% at 31 °C. Exposure also increased daytime food intake, and the researchers concluded that RF-EMF exposure can induce energy-saving processes without strongly disturbing the overall sleep pattern.
Odacı E et al. · 2013
Researchers exposed pregnant rats to 900 MHz electromagnetic fields for one hour daily between days 13 and 21 of pregnancy, then assessed the female pups' spinal cord tissue and motor behavior. The rotarod test showed a significant increase in motor functions in the EMF group pups (p=0.037), while the open field test found no difference between groups. Pathological changes were observed in the spinal cords of the EMF group pups, and the researchers suggested these changes may have led to the increase in motor activity.
Ntzouni MP et al. · 2013
Narayanan SN et al. · 2013
Researchers exposed male adolescent rats to radio-frequency electromagnetic radiation at 900 MHz from an active mobile phone, then tested their emotionality and locomotion. In the elevated plus maze test, exposed rats showed significantly reduced open-arm entries, time on open arms, and distance on open arms, along with decreased rearing and grooming frequency. Total distance travelled and total arm entries did not differ significantly between exposed and control rats.
Moretti D et al. · 2013
Researchers developed a dedicated experimental setup for the simultaneous exposure of neuronal networks and monitoring of electrical activity. In this pilot study on 16 cultures, there was a 30% reversible decrease in firing rate and bursting rate during a 3-minute exposure. The researchers noted that additional experiments are needed to further characterize this effect.
Mandalà M et al. · 2013
Researchers conducted a study to verify whether Bluetooth devices reduce the auditory nerve effects seen with direct mobile phone electromagnetic field exposure, using the same experimental protocol as a prior investigation. Twelve patients underwent retrosigmoid vestibular neurectomy to treat definite unilateral Ménière's disease while being monitored with acoustically evoked CNAPs during direct mobile phone or Bluetooth headset exposure. Bluetooth electromagnetic fields did not produce any significant change in cochlear nerve activity, while mobile phone electromagnetic fields caused a significant decrease in CNAP amplitude and an increase in latency in all subjects.
Lv B, Chen Z, Wu T, Shao Q, Yan D, Ma L, Lu K, Xie Y. · 2013
Eighteen subjects participated in a double-blind, crossover, randomized and counterbalanced experiment including real and sham exposure sessions. Resting-state fMRI signals were collected before and after exposure, with the radiation source placed close to the right ear. After real exposure, decreased ALFF values were found in the left superior temporal gyrus, left middle temporal gyrus, right superior temporal gyrus, right medial frontal gyrus, and right paracentral lobule.
Hao D, Yang L, Chen S, Tong J, Tian Y, Su B, Wu S, Zeng Y · 2013
Researchers exposed 32 trained Wistar rats to 916 MHz, 10w/m2 electromagnetic field for 6 hours a day, 5 days a week, over 10 weeks, and tested their spatial learning and memory in an eight-arm radial maze each weekend. During weeks 4–5, the exposed rats had longer completion times and higher error rates than the control group, but during weeks 1–3 and 6–9 the two groups were close to each other. The researchers concluded that the 916 MHz EMF influenced learning and memory in rats to some extent in a period during exposure, and that the rats can adapt to long-term EMF exposure.
Haghani M, Shabani M, Moazzami K · 2013
Researchers exposed pregnant Wistar rats to 900-MHz pulse-EMF irradiation for 6 hours per day throughout gestation, then evaluated ten offspring per group. Behavioral tests did not reveal any abnormalities in the exposed offspring. Whole-cell patch clamp recordings revealed decreased neuronal excitability of Purkinje cells, with changes in afterhyperpolarization amplitude, spike frequency, half width, and first spike latency.
Deshmukh PS et al. · 2013
The study investigated possible DNA-damaging effects of low-level microwave radiation in the brains of male Fischer rats. Rats were exposed for 30 days at three frequencies: 900, 1800, and 2450 MHz, at specific absorption rates on the order of 10−4 W/kg. DNA damage in brain tissue was assessed using alkaline comet assay after the exposure period. The researchers concluded that low SAR microwave radiation at these frequencies may induce DNA strand breaks in brain tissue.
Deshmukh PS et al. · 2013
Cammaerts MC, Rachidi Z, Bellens F, De Doncker P · 2013
Researchers used the ant species Myrmica sabuleti to study how electromagnetic waves affect the insects' responses to pheromones and food collection. Workers' responses to trail, area-marking, and alarm pheromones were measured under normal conditions and then again while under the influence of electromagnetic waves. Under exposure, ants followed trails for only short distances, no longer arrived at marked areas, and no longer orientated themselves to a source of alarm pheromone. The number of ants collecting food increased only slightly and slowly, and after 180 hours of exposure their colonies deteriorated.
Baş O et al. · 2013
Researchers exposed pregnant rats to a 900 MHz electromagnetic field on days 13 through 21 of pregnancy, then examined the brains of their female pups on postnatal day 32. Exposure during those prenatal days led to a significant decrease in the number of pyramidal cells in the cornu ammonis of the female rat pups (P<0.05). Histopathological examination also revealed picnotic cells in the cornu ammonis of the exposed female rat pups.
Banaceur S, Banasr S, Sakly M, Abdelmelek H · 2013
Researchers studied the effects of 2.4 GHz radiofrequency signals on wildtype mice and triple transgenic mice bred to develop Alzheimer's-like cognitive impairment. Mice were exposed two hours per day during one month at a Specific Absorption Rate of 1.60 W/kg. The researchers reported that radiofrequency exposure improved cognitive behavior in the 3xTg-AD mice.
Aboul Ezz HS, Khadrawy YA, Ahmed NA, Radwan NM, El Bakry MM · 2013
Researchers investigated the effect of electromagnetic radiation on concentrations of dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin in the hippocampus, hypothalamus, midbrain, and medulla oblongata of adult rats. Adult rats were exposed daily to electromagnetic radiation at 1800 MHz, with a specific absorption rate of 0.843 W/kg and power density of 0.02 mW/cm2, modulated at 217 Hz. Measurements were taken after 1, 2, and 4 months of daily exposure, and also after stopping exposure for 1 month following 4 months of daily exposure. The exposure resulted in significant changes in dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin in all four brain areas studied.
Yu D, Zhang R, Liu Q. · 2012
Researchers used computer modeling to study how metal dental work affects radiation absorption from cell phones held against the head. They found that certain types of metal dental crowns can more than double the amount of electromagnetic energy absorbed in nearby tissues when positioned parallel to the phone's antenna. Despite this significant increase, the radiation levels remained within current safety limits set by international health organizations.
Wallace D et al. · 2012
Researchers tested whether TETRA radio signals (used by UK police and emergency services) cause health symptoms in people who report being sensitive to electromagnetic fields. When participants didn't know whether they were exposed to real or fake signals, neither the sensitive individuals nor control subjects showed any physical or psychological effects from TETRA exposure. However, when people knew they might be exposed, those claiming sensitivity reported feeling worse, suggesting their symptoms stem from worry about EMF rather than the signals themselves.
Stewart A, Rao JN, Middleton JD, Pearmain P, Evans T · 2012
Researchers investigated whether a cell phone tower could be causing cancer cases on one street in England after residents expressed concern. They analyzed cancer data from 19 affected residents and compared it to regional averages over 12 years. While they found slightly higher cancer rates in the area during one time period, the cases didn't qualify as a true cancer cluster and couldn't be linked to the nearby cell tower.
Söderqvist F, Carlberg M, Zetterberg H, Hardell L · 2012
Swedish researchers measured β-trace protein levels (an enzyme involved in producing a natural sleep hormone) in 314 randomly selected adults to see if wireless phone use affected sleep biochemistry. Overall, they found no significant association between phone use and protein levels, though younger adults (18-30 years) showed some indication of lower protein levels with heavier long-term phone use. The study suggests wireless phones may not substantially disrupt the body's natural sleep-promoting chemical pathways.
Söderqvist F, Carlberg M, Hardell L · 2012
Swedish researchers studied 69 people with salivary gland tumors (mostly near the ear) and compared their phone use to 262 healthy controls. They found no increased risk of these tumors from wireless phone use, with an odds ratio of 0.8 (meaning slightly lower risk, though not statistically significant). The study provides reassurance for light-to-moderate phone users but acknowledges it cannot rule out risks from heavy, long-term use.
Ros-Llor I et al. · 2012
Researchers examined DNA damage in mouth cells from 50 mobile phone users by comparing cells from the side of the face where they held their phone versus the opposite side. They found no differences in genetic damage markers (called micronuclei) between the phone side and non-phone side, regardless of how long people had been using mobile phones. This suggests that typical mobile phone use may not cause detectable DNA damage in oral tissues.
Redmayne M, Smith E, Abramson MJ. · 2012
Researchers studied how accurately teenagers remember and estimate their cell phone usage by surveying 373 students about their texting and calling habits. They discovered that people think about phone usage on a logarithmic scale, meaning they round numbers heavily (like saying 20 instead of 17, or 200 instead of 180) and become less precise with larger numbers. This finding is important because many EMF health studies rely on people accurately recalling how much they used their phones, but this research shows those estimates may be systematically flawed.
Redmayne M, Smith E, Abramson MJ. · 2012
Researchers developed a new statistical method to improve the accuracy of cell phone usage estimates in health studies. They found that people are very poor at remembering how much they actually use their phones, leading to significant errors that could make health risks appear smaller than they really are. This mathematical approach could help future studies better identify real health effects by correcting for these memory biases.
Poulletier de Gannes F et al. · 2012
French researchers exposed pregnant rats to Wi-Fi signals (2.45 GHz) for 2 hours daily during pregnancy to test whether this radiation could harm developing babies. They found no birth defects, developmental problems, or other harmful effects in the rat pups, even at the highest exposure level tested (4 W/kg). This study suggests that Wi-Fi exposure during pregnancy may not cause developmental harm at levels tested.
