Unknown authors · 2015
Researchers measured extremely low-frequency magnetic fields around electric substations at a petrochemical plant in Iran to identify hazardous exposure zones for workers. They found magnetic field levels ranging from 0.02 to 49.90 microtesla (μT), with the highest exposures near transformers, incoming panels, and cables. The study created hazard maps to help protect workers from chronic EMF exposure in industrial settings.
Prato FS · 2015
Researchers discovered that extremely low frequency magnetic fields can alter how the body responds to pain and opioid medications, with effects documented across species from snails to humans over 30 years of study. The findings show these magnetic fields can both increase and decrease pain sensitivity depending on exposure conditions. This research opens new possibilities for treating chronic pain using electromagnetic therapy.
Unknown authors · 2015
This large Nordic study tracked 5,409 acute myeloid leukemia cases and 27,045 controls across four countries to examine whether occupational exposure to extremely low-frequency magnetic fields (like from power lines) or electrical shocks increases leukemia risk. The researchers found no association between either type of workplace exposure and acute myeloid leukemia development.
Unknown authors · 2015
Researchers examined whether weak 50/60 Hz magnetic fields from power lines could disrupt our internal body clocks by affecting cryptochromes, special proteins that help regulate circadian rhythms. The study tested the basic scientific premise behind this 'cryptochrome hypothesis' by looking at how static magnetic fields might change these proteins' chemical balance. This research aims to understand if everyday electromagnetic exposure could be throwing off our natural sleep-wake cycles.
Tomitsch J, Dechant E et al · 2015
Austrian researchers measured electromagnetic field levels in 219 bedrooms from 2006 to 2012, tracking changes in household EMF exposure over time. They found that power line frequency fields decreased slightly, but wireless radiation (RF-EMF) nearly doubled, with urban areas showing 3.4 times higher wireless exposure than rural areas. This study documents the rapid increase in wireless radiation exposure as smartphones and WiFi became widespread.
Gryz K et al · 2015
Researchers used computer models to test how the human body affects radiofrequency measurements from personal EMF meters worn at different body locations. They found measurement errors ranging from -96% to +133% compared to actual field strength, with waist and chest positions providing the most reliable readings.
Unknown authors · 2015
Researchers measured radiofrequency radiation levels at two television stations in Ghana to assess worker exposure. They found RF levels ranging from 0.006 to 58.5 volts per meter, which stayed below occupational safety limits but exceeded public exposure guidelines by over 4 times in some areas. This highlights how broadcast facilities can create significant EMF exposure zones that affect both workers and nearby communities.
Unknown authors · 2015
Israeli researchers measured radiofrequency exposure levels across 25 different occupations, taking nearly 4,300 measurements from workers in broadcasting, medical, communications, and other RF-using industries. They found that walkie-talkie users, plastic welders, and industrial heating workers face the highest exposures, with walkie-talkie operators receiving 94% of safety limits during routine work. Most other occupations stayed well below established safety thresholds, though some workers experienced brief spikes above recommended levels.
Unknown authors · 2015
This 2015 research review examined how radiofrequency electromagnetic fields from cell towers and wireless infrastructure disrupt wildlife navigation systems. The study found that RF radiation at environmental levels commonly found in urban areas interferes with animals' ability to sense Earth's magnetic field for orientation. This disruption poses particular threats to migratory birds and insects that rely on magnetic navigation.
Unknown authors · 2015
This 2015 international policy review examined how different countries and organizations advise protecting children from radiofrequency EMF exposure from wireless devices. The research found wildly inconsistent approaches, ranging from no special precautions to extensive warnings and sales restrictions. The author concluded that simple assurance of long-term safety cannot be guaranteed and recommended minimum exposure for children as a basic health precaution.
Unknown authors · 2015
Researchers measured radiofrequency radiation levels inside buildings across 343 locations in Hebron, Palestine, from sources like cell towers, FM radio, WiFi, and cordless phones. They found maximum exposure levels about 100 times below international safety guidelines, with FM radio contributing nearly half of total indoor RF exposure. The study shows that outdoor RF sources account for 73% of the radiation people experience indoors.
Tomitsch J, Dechant E et al · 2015
Austrian researchers measured EMF levels in 219 bedrooms from 2006 to 2012, tracking changes in power line fields and wireless radiation. They found power line electric fields decreased by 40% while total wireless radiation nearly doubled, with urban areas showing 3.4 times higher wireless exposure than rural locations. The study reveals how our bedroom EMF environment has shifted dramatically toward wireless sources.
Gryz K et al · 2015
Researchers tested how the human body affects personal EMF meters that measure radiofrequency radiation from 98-2450 MHz. They found that where you wear the device on your body dramatically changes the readings, with errors ranging from -96% to +133% compared to actual field strength. This means current EMF exposure assessments using body-worn devices may be significantly inaccurate.
Unknown authors · 2015
Researchers measured radiofrequency radiation exposure levels at two television stations in Ghana to assess worker safety. They found radiation levels generally below occupational safety limits, but some areas had exposures 4.3 times higher than limits set for the general public. This highlights potential health risks for broadcast workers in high-exposure zones.
Unknown authors · 2015
Israeli researchers measured radiofrequency radiation exposure across 25 different occupations, recording nearly 4,300 measurements from workers in broadcasting, medical, communications, and other RF-using industries. While most routine exposures stayed well below safety limits, walkie-talkie users, induction heating workers, and plastic welders faced the highest exposure levels, with some workers exceeding recommended thresholds during certain tasks.
Unknown authors · 2015
This 2015 review examined how radiofrequency radiation from cell towers and wireless infrastructure disrupts wildlife's natural magnetic navigation systems. The research found that RF exposure at environmental levels commonly found in cities and near base stations interferes with animals' ability to sense Earth's magnetic field for orientation. This disruption could significantly impact migratory birds and insects, particularly in urban areas but also in protected natural areas with powerful RF transmitters.
Unknown authors · 2015
This 2015 policy review examined how different countries and organizations respond to children's exposure to wireless radiation. The author found enormous variation, from no special precautions to extensive warnings and restrictions, and noted that current safety guidelines only address immediate heating effects while ignoring potential long-term health impacts from chronic low-level exposure. The study calls for minimum RF-EMF exposure for children as a reasonable health precaution.
Unknown authors · 2015
Researchers measured radiofrequency radiation exposure in 343 indoor locations across Hebron, Palestine, from sources like cell towers, FM radio, WiFi, and cordless phones. While all measurements fell below international safety guidelines, FM radio contributed nearly half of total indoor RF exposure, with outdoor sources accounting for 73% of indoor radiation levels.
Tomitsch J, Dechant E et al · 2015
Austrian researchers measured electromagnetic field levels in 219 bedrooms over six years (2006-2012), tracking changes in both power line frequencies and wireless radiation. They found power line electric fields decreased by 40% while wireless radiation nearly doubled, with urban areas showing 3.4 times higher wireless exposure than rural locations. The study reveals how our bedroom EMF environment has shifted dramatically toward wireless sources.
Unknown authors · 2015
Swedish researchers validated how accurately people remember when they first started using mobile phones by comparing self-reported dates with actual cellular network records from 207 participants. They found substantial errors in memory, with people typically misremembering their start date by several years, though both brain tumor patients and healthy controls showed similar recall problems.
Li C et al · 2015
Researchers created detailed computer models of infant bodies (12-month and 17-month-old boys) to study how electromagnetic fields affect babies differently than adults. The models revealed significant physical differences that could mean current safety guidelines don't adequately protect infants from radiofrequency radiation exposure.
Unknown authors · 2015
Researchers exposed rats to 2100 MHz radiofrequency radiation (3G cell phone frequency) for either 10 or 40 days and examined their parotid salivary glands. The study found significant tissue damage in exposed rats, with more severe damage occurring after longer exposure periods. This suggests that the radiation frequency used by 3G phones can harm salivary gland tissue.
Adibzadeh F et al · 2015
Researchers tested how different head shapes and sizes affect radiation absorption from cell phones using computer models of 20 different heads. They found dramatic variations in brain radiation exposure - up to 16 times higher in some people compared to others when using phones at the same power level. This suggests that standard safety testing using only generic head models may not protect everyone equally.
Freudenstein F et al · 2015
This European study examined how people perceive risks from different radiofrequency EMF sources like cell towers and mobile phones, and whether better knowledge about EMF exposure affects their concerns. Researchers found that people worry most about cell towers compared to other RF sources, and surprisingly, those with better technical knowledge about EMF exposure actually had higher risk perception, especially for mobile phones.
Paul B et al · 2015
This 2015 Indian public health review examined the documented health effects of mobile phone radiofrequency radiation, including short-term impacts on sleep, heart rate, and blood pressure, plus long-term cancer risks. The authors called for stronger government regulations, enforcement of phone-free zones, and public education campaigns to reduce exposure.
