6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Research Guide

5G vs 4G Radiation: What's Different?

Based on 493 peer-reviewed studies

Share:
At a Glance

Of the 488 peer-reviewed studies in this collection on radiofrequency exposure, 364 — 74.6% — reported biological effects. Almost all of that research covers frequencies 4G and 5G share; the millimeter-wave band unique to high-band 5G is barely represented. The meaningful difference is not the generation label but the dose: how close the transmitter is, how long it transmits, and how hard it has to work to reach the network.

Based on analysis of 493 peer-reviewed studies

People often ask whether 5G is more dangerous than 4G. This question requires understanding how 5G technology differs from previous generations and what research exists on each.

5G networks operate across multiple frequency bands. Low-band 5G (600-900 MHz) is actually similar to 4G frequencies. Mid-band 5G (2.5-4 GHz) overlaps with existing WiFi. High-band 5G (24-40+ GHz, "millimeter wave") represents the newest frequencies for consumer wireless exposure.

This page compares what research shows about radiation exposure from 5G versus 4G technologies.

Key Findings

  • -364 of 488 studies (74.6%) in this collection found biological effects from radiofrequency exposure
  • -The research does not separate 4G from 5G — it covers the shared frequency ranges, so no study here supports the claim that one generation is biologically worse than the other
  • -Millimeter waves penetrate tissue less deeply but represent the least-studied part of 5G
  • -Effects depend on absorbed dose, not signal format — four different cellular signal technologies produced chromosomal damage only under extended exposure at an average absorption of at least 5.0 W/kg (Tice 2002)
  • -Denser networks can reduce personal exposure — a handset with a strong signal transmits at lower power than one reaching for a distant tower, and the handset is the dominant source for most people

What the Research Shows

What Actually Differs

4G networks operate roughly between 700 MHz and 2.6 GHz. 5G spans a far broader range: low and mid bands that overlap 4G and WiFi, and high bands extending toward about 100 GHz. Those are spectrum allocations rather than research findings, and they frame the comparison.

Of the 488 peer-reviewed studies indexed here on radiofrequency exposure, 364 — 74.6% — reported measurable biological effects. That literature was built on the lower frequencies, which both generations use. No study here compares 4G against 5G directly.

Why Frequency Alone Does Not Settle It

Higher frequencies penetrate tissue less deeply. Millimeter waves deposit their energy largely in skin and the outer surface of the eye rather than reaching deep organs, which changes which tissues are exposed rather than removing exposure. Lower frequencies penetrate further but carry less energy per photon — still far too little to break chemical bonds directly, which is why every effect discussed here is non-thermal and indirect rather than ionizing.

What the Research Found, and at What Dose

Tice and colleagues (2002) tested four cellular signal technologies — analog, TDMA, CDMA and GSM formats at 837 and 1909 MHz — on cultured human blood cells. Three or 24 hours of exposure produced no significant DNA damage in leukocytes. Extended exposure at an average specific absorption rate of at least 5.0 W/kg did induce chromosomal damage in lymphocytes. Signal format did not determine the outcome; dose did.

Lai and Singh (1995) found DNA single-strand breaks in rat brain cells rising with dose rate across 0.6 and 1.2 W/kg after two hours at 2450 MHz, and their 1996 study found both single- and double-strand breaks at 1.2 W/kg. Their 1997 work showed melatonin and a spin-trap compound both blocked the effect, implicating free radicals rather than heating.

The Variable That Actually Matters

For almost everyone, the largest single radiofrequency exposure is their own phone against their head, not any tower. That exposure depends on transmit power, which depends on signal quality. A handset with a weak signal increases power to reach the network; a handset with a strong signal backs off. This is why adding antennas can reduce rather than increase personal exposure, and why the generation label on the network is a poor predictor of what any individual absorbs.

What the Evidence Does Not Show

No study here establishes that 5G is more harmful than 4G, or less. The comparison has not been run. What the research supports is that radiofrequency exposure at sufficient dose produces non-thermal biological effects, that the doses involved are typically at handset-against-head levels rather than ambient network levels, and that the newest part of 5G has not been meaningfully studied at all.

Practical Consequence

The steps that reduce exposure are the same on either network: speaker mode or wired headphones for calls, texting over calling, phone out of the bedroom overnight, and WiFi rather than cellular where the cellular signal is weak. None depends on which generation the network runs.

Related Studies (493)

Effect of a 2.45-GHz radiofrequency electromagnetic field on neutrophil chemotaxis and phagocytosis in differentiated human HL-60 cells.

Koyama S et al. · 2014

Researchers examined the effect of 2.45-GHz radiofrequency fields at SARs of 2 and 10 W/kg for 4 and 24 hours on neutrophil chemotaxis and phagocytosis in differentiated human HL-60 cells. Neutrophil chemotaxis was not affected by radiofrequency field exposure, and phagocytosis was not affected either compared with sham exposure conditions. Exposure at an SAR under 10 W/kg showed very little or no effects on either chemotaxis or phagocytosis.

Invitro effects of low intensity 1.8 GHz radiofrequency radiation on human peripheral blood leukocytes from healthy donors: A morphometric and morphological study.

Jirillo E et al. · 2014

Researchers exposed 108 samples of human leukocytes from healthy donors to electromagnetic radiation at different intensities using a reverberation chamber. Exposure times ranged from 5 minutes to 24 hours, and sham-exposed blood samples from the same donors served as controls. In 68% of the 108 cases, an increase in leukocyte cell area was found along with morphological changes, while in 14% a decrease in cell area was observed. In 18% of cases, no effects dependent on the radiation were detected.

In vivo analysis of THz wave irradiation induced acute inflammatory response in skin by laser-scanning confocal microscopy.

Hwang Y, Ahn J, Mun J, Bae S, Jeong YU, Vinokurov NA, Kim P. · 2014

Researchers irradiated the ear skin of a live anesthetized mouse with pulsed THz waves and monitored the response at the cellular level using intravital laser-scanning confocal microscopy. The pulsed THz wave used was 2.7 THz with a 4 μs pulsewidth, 61.4 μJ per pulse, at a 3 Hz repetition rate, applied at an average power of 260 mW/cm2 for 30 minutes. No temperature change was detected at the skin surface, while a massive recruitment of newly infiltrated neutrophils was observed in the irradiated area after 6 hours.

Transcriptome Analysis Reveals the Contribution of Thermal and the Specific Effects in Cellular Response to Millimeter Wave Exposure.

Habauzit D et al. · 2014

Researchers used a whole gene expression approach to assess the effect of acute 60 GHz exposure on primary cultures of human keratinocytes. Exposure led to an increase of temperature and a strong modification of keratinocyte gene expression, with 665 genes differentially expressed. When temperature was artificially kept constant, no modification in gene expression was observed after millimeter wave exposure. A heat shock control did not mimic exactly the millimeter wave effect, suggesting a slight but specific electromagnetic effect under hyperthermia conditions, with 34 genes differentially expressed.

Modifying Effects of Low-Intensity Extremely High-Frequency Electromagnetic Radiation on Content and Composition of Fatty Acids in Thymus of Mice Exposed to X-Rays.

Gapeyev AB, Aripovsky AV, Kulagina TP. · 2014

Researchers studied whether extremely high-frequency electromagnetic radiation (EHF EMR) could modify fatty acid content and composition in the thymus of mice also exposed to X-rays. Mice were exposed to low-intensity pulse-modulated EHF EMR at 42.2 GHz and/or X-rays at a dose of 4 Gy, with measurements taken at several time points up to 40 days after exposure. X-irradiation alone significantly increased total fatty acid content in thymic tissue within 4 to 5 hours and decreased it at 10 and 30 days, while thymus weight remained significantly reduced on days 30 and 40. When EHF EMR was applied before or after X-irradiation, changes in total fatty acid content were prevented and thymus weight restoration was promoted by day 40.

Effects of 900 MHz Radiofrequency Radiation on Skin Hydroxyproline Contents.

Cam ST, Seyhan N, Kavaklı C, Celikbıçak O. · 2014

The study investigated whether pulse-modulated radiofrequency radiation affects hydroxyproline content in rat skin, because skin is described as the first target of external electromagnetic fields. Two-month-old male Wistar rats were exposed to 900 MHz pulse-modulated radiofrequency radiation at an average whole-body SAR of 1.35 W/kg for 20 min/day for 3 weeks. Exposure caused a statistically significant increase in skin hydroxyproline level (p = 0.049), at a SAR below the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection safety limit.

The effect of 900 and 1800MHz GSM-like radiofrequency irradiation and nicotine sulfate administration on the embryonic development of Xenopus laevis.

Boga A et al. · 2014

Researchers investigated the effects of GSM-like radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation and nicotine sulfate exposure on the embryonic development of Xenopus laevis (African clawed frogs). With the exception of the 1800 MHz exposure, radiofrequency radiation alone was not associated with dramatic developmental anomalies. The combined effects of radiofrequency radiation and nicotine sulfate on the embryos were more severe than the effect of either exposure alone.

Adaptive Response in Mice Exposed to 900 MHz Radiofrequency Fields: Bleomycin-induced DNA and Oxidative Damage/Repair.

Zong C, Ji Y, He Q, Zhu S, Qin F, Tong J, Cao Y. · 2014

Researchers exposed adult mice to 900 MHz radiofrequency fields at 120 μW/cm2 power density for 4 hours per day for 7 days, then injected some mice with bleomycin. Radiofrequency exposure alone showed no indications of increased DNA or oxidative damage compared to mice treated with bleomycin alone. Mice exposed to radiofrequency fields and then given bleomycin showed significantly reduced DNA damage at each repair time point measured, as well as decreased MDA levels and increased SOD levels.

Effects of 940 MHz EMF on bioluminescence and oxidative response of stable luciferase producing HEK cells.

Sefidbakht Y et al. · 2014

Researchers exposed HEK293T cells carrying a firefly luciferase gene to 940 MHz RF-EMF at a mean specific absorption rate of approximately 0.09 W kg-1. The effects of exposure durations of 15, 30, 45, 60 and 90 minutes on luciferase activity and oxidative response elements were investigated. Luciferase activity was reduced after 30 and 45 minutes of continuous exposure, while after 60 minutes the exposed cells showed higher luciferase activity compared with non-exposed controls. ROS generation was highest in the 30-minute exposed cells, followed by a sharp rise in catalase and superoxide dismutase activity and elevation of glutathione during the 45-minute exposure.

The Effects of N-acetyl-L-cysteine and Epigallocatechin-3-gallate on Liver Tissue Protein Oxidation and Antioxidant Enzyme Levels After the Exposure to Radio Frequency Radiation.

Ozgur E et al. · 2014

Researchers exposed adult male guinea pigs to GSM-modulated radio frequency radiation at an average whole body SAR of 0.4 W/kg for 10 or 20 minutes daily for seven consecutive days. The study measured protein oxidation, advanced oxidation protein products, and superoxide dismutase activity in liver tissue, and also tested NAC and EGCG as potential protective treatments. SOD activity significantly decreased after radio frequency radiation exposure, but protein damage did not change. NAC treatment alone increased PCO levels, and EGCG treatment alone elevated AOPP levels.

Reactive oxygen species elevation and recovery in Drosophila bodies and ovaries following short-term and long-term exposure to DECT base EMF

Manta AK, Stravopodis DJ, Papassideri IS, Margaritis LH. · 2014

Researchers measured reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels in the bodies and ovaries of 4-day-old Drosophila melanogaster flies after exposing them to DECT base radiation at 1.88–1.90 GHz. Male and female bodies showed a twofold increase in ROS levels after 6 hours of exposure, with ROS levels returning to normal 24 hours after that exposure ended. Ovaries responded more quickly, reaching a 2.5-fold ROS increase after 1 hour of exposure, with levels returning to normal 4 hours after that exposure ended.

The protective effect of autophagy on mouse spermatocyte derived cells exposure to 1800MHz radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation.

Liu K et al. · 2014

Researchers exposed mouse spermatocyte-derived cells (GC-2) to 1800 MHz GSM signals at SAR values of 1, 2, or 4 w/kg for 24 hours. The expression of LC3-II increased in a dose- and time-dependent manner with RF exposure, and showed a significant change at the SAR value of 4 w/kg. RF exposure did not increase the percentage of apoptotic cells, but inhibition of autophagy could increase the percentage of apoptotic cells. The findings suggested that autophagy flux could be enhanced by 1800 MHz GSM exposure, mediated by ROS generation.

Evaluation of selected biochemical parameters in the saliva of young males using mobile phones

Abu Khadra KM, Khalil AM, Abu Samak M, Aljaberi A. · 2014

Researchers evaluated biochemical parameters in the saliva of 12 young males before and after using a mobile phone. The phone emitted radio frequency signals of 1800 MHz with a 1.09 w/kg specific absorption rate, and participants used it for 15 and 30 minutes. SOD levels followed a quadratic trend, rising after 15 minutes of talking but then dropping as talking time increased. The researchers suggested that exposure to electromagnetic radiation may exert an oxidative stress on human cells, as evidenced by the increase in the concentration of the superoxide radical anion released in the saliva of cell phone users.

The relationship between NMDA receptors and microwave-induced learning and memory impairment: A long-term observation on Wistar rats.

Wang H et al. · 2014

Eighty Wistar rats were exposed to a 2.856 GHz pulsed microwave source at power densities of 0 mW/cm2 and 50 mW/cm2 for 6 minutes, and then observed at multiple time points up to 18 months after exposure. The microwave-exposed rats showed consistent deficiencies in spatial learning and memory. The level of amino acid neurotransmitters decreased after microwave radiation, and the ratio of glutamate and gamma-aminobutyric acid significantly decreased at 6 months. The hippocampus showed varying degrees of degeneration of neurons, and NR1 and NR2B expression showed a significant decrease, especially NR2B expression.

The in vivo effects of low-intensity radiofrequency fields on the motor activity of protozoa

Sarapultseva EI, Igolkina JV, Tikhonov VN, Dubrova YE · 2014

Researchers exposed the ciliate Spirostomum ambiguum to 1 GHz and 10 GHz radiofrequency electromagnetic fields at power flux densities ranging from 0.05 to 0.5 W/m2 for periods from 0.05 to 10 hours. Exposure to 0.1 W/m2 of either 1 or 10 GHz radiofrequency fields resulted in a significant decrease in the motility of the ciliates. The motility of unexposed offspring of ciliates that had been irradiated with 0.1 W/m2 of 10 GHz radiofrequency fields remained significantly compromised across at least 10 to 15 generations.

Immunohistochemical localization of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor in the superior olivary complex of mice after radiofrequency exposure

Maskey D, Kim MJ · 2014

Researchers applied radiofrequency at a specific absorption rate of 1.6 W/kg or 0 W/kg to mice to study the distribution of BDNF and GDNF in the nuclei of the superior olivary complex. In the exposed group, significant reductions in BDNF immunoreactivity were noted in the lateral superior olive, medial superior olive, superior paraolivary nucleus, and medial nucleus of the trapezoid body. GDNF immunoreactivity was also significantly decreased (p < 0.001) in all superior olivary complex nuclei of the exposed group. The researchers suggested that the decrease in these neurotrophic factors in the superior olivary complex suggests a detrimental effect of RF exposure in the auditory nuclei.

Differential Pro-Inflammatory Responses of Astrocytes and Microglia Involve STAT3 Activation in Response to 1800 MHz Radiofrequency Fields.

Lu Y et al. · 2014

Researchers exposed microglial N9 and astroglial C8-D1A cells to 1800 MHz radiofrequency fields to study pro-inflammatory responses and the mechanisms involved. Radiofrequency exposure induced different expression and release profiles of inflammatory markers including IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6, PGE2, nitric oxide, inducible nitric oxide synthase, and cyclooxygenase 2 in the two cell types. STAT3 was activated by radiofrequency exposure in microglia but not in astrocytes, and the STAT3 inhibitor Stattic reduced the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines in microglia but not in astrocytes.

Alterations of cognitive function and 5-HT system in rats after long term microwave exposure.

Li H et al. · 2014

Researchers exposed Wistar rats to 2.856 GHz microwaves at power densities of 5, 10, 20, or 30 mW/cm2 for 6 minutes three times a week for up to 6 weeks. Spatial learning and memory, hippocampus structure, brain electrical activity, and neurotransmitter levels were assessed at different time points after the last exposure. The study found dose-dependent memory deficits alongside inhibition of brain electrical activity, hippocampus neuron degeneration, and neurotransmitter disturbances. The researchers suggested that the serotonin system may be involved in the cognitive deficits seen after long-term microwave exposure.

Exposure to 1800 MHz radiofrequency radiation impairs neurite outgrowth of embryonic neural stem cells

Chen C et al. · 2014

Researchers exposed embryonic neural stem cells (eNSCs) to 1800 MHz radiofrequency electromagnetic fields at SAR values of 1, 2, and 4 W/kg for 1, 2, and 3 days. RF-EMF exposure did not influence eNSC apoptosis, proliferation, cell cycle, or the ratio of differentiated neurons and astrocytes. However, neurite outgrowth of eNSC-derived neurons was inhibited after 4 W/kg RF-EMF exposure for 3 days. The mRNA and protein expression of proneural genes Ngn1 and NeuroD were decreased after RF-EMF exposure, while expression of their inhibitor Hes1 was upregulated.

DNA & Genetic DamageNo Effects Found

No genotoxic effect in exfoliated bladder cells of rat under the exposure of 1800 and 2100-MHz radio frequency radiation.

Gurbuz N, Sirav B, Colbay M, Yetkin I, Seyhan N. · 2013

Researchers exposed male Wistar albino rats to 1800 MHz or 2100 MHz radiofrequency radiation for 30 min per day, 6 days per week, for either a month or two months. They measured micronucleus frequency in exfoliated bladder cells as an indicator of genotoxic damage. No significant differences in micronucleus frequency were found between any exposed group and its corresponding control group, nor between the two 2100 MHz exposure durations.

DNA & Genetic DamageNo Effects Found

Influence of GSM Signals on Human Peripheral Lymphocytes: Study of Genotoxicity.

Waldmann P et al. · 2013

Researchers investigated whether GSM 1,800 MHz radiofrequency fields cause genotoxic effects in human lymphocytes. Blood from 20 healthy volunteers was exposed to three specific absorption rates of 0.2, 2, and 10 W/kg and sham for 28 hours. Four genotoxicity tests were conducted, including chromosome aberration, micronucleus, sister chromatid exchange, and comet assays. None of the nine endpoints showed a significant and reproducible exposure effect across the three analyzing laboratories. Positive controls showed highly significant differences from sham exposures, validating the study methods.

Effects of microwave (2.45 GHz) irradiation on some biological characters of Salmonella typhimurium.

Nasri K, Daghfous D, Landoulsi A. · 2013

The study evaluated the effects of sub-lethal microwave radiation on Salmonella typhimurium. The bacteria were exposed to a dose of 3600 J delivered as a 40-second exposure at 90 W. Exposure significantly inhibited cellular growth. The treatment increased the effectiveness of most tested antibiotics, with exposed bacteria showing new or improved sensitivity. Gas chromatography analysis showed an increase in unsaturated fatty acids, and the bacteria became more sensitive to sodium deoxycholate and released more extracellular proteins, indicating membrane weakening.

Collagen synthesis modulated in wounds treated by pulsed radiofrequency energy.

Kao HK, Li Q, Flynn B, Qiao X, Ruberti JW, Murphy GF, Guo L. · 2013

Researchers exposed wounded diabetic mice to pulsed radiofrequency energy and assessed wound closure, cell proliferation, and gene expression. Pulsed radiofrequency energy increased dermal cell proliferation and collagen synthesis in the wounds. However, CD31 density and expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and basic fibroblast growth factor did not differ significantly between treated and sham groups. In fibroblast cultures, pulsed radiofrequency energy increased gelation time compared to sham exposure.

What This Means for You

  1. Both 4G and 5G emit non-ionizing radiation - the key variable is proximity and duration of exposure.
  2. 5G uses higher frequencies but lower power per antenna - the health implications are still being studied.
  3. Distance remains the most effective protection regardless of network generation.
  4. Use a phone shield to deflect radiation from your device. SYB Phone Shield

Further Reading:

Frequently Asked Questions

Not in a way that reduces to a single comparison. 5G spans a wider range of frequencies, including millimeter waves that 4G does not use, and 5G deployments typically involve more antennas placed closer together. More antennas closer together means each handset transmits at lower power, since transmit power scales with how hard the phone must work to reach the network. No study in this collection measured 4G against 5G directly.
The research does not answer this, because it was not designed to. The studies here cover frequency ranges both generations use and show effects that depend on absorbed dose rather than on signal format — four different cellular technologies produced chromosomal damage only at an average absorption of 5.0 W/kg or above (Tice 2002). The millimeter-wave portion of 5G is the genuine unknown, not because it has been shown risky but because it has barely been studied.
4G runs roughly between 700 MHz and 2.6 GHz. 5G uses low and mid bands overlapping that range plus high bands reaching toward about 100 GHz. Higher frequencies penetrate tissue less deeply, depositing energy nearer the surface. All of it is non-ionizing, meaning none of it carries enough energy per photon to break chemical bonds directly — the documented effects run through indirect pathways such as oxidative stress.
The evidence does not support ranking them. It supports paying attention to dose: how close the transmitter sits to your body, for how long, and at what power. Your handset dominates that calculation regardless of network generation, which means the same handful of habits — headphones, texting, phone out of the bedroom — address the exposure that actually matters.

Further Reading

For a comprehensive exploration of EMF health effects and practical protection strategies, explore these books by R Blank and Dr. Martin Blank.