8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Research Guide

Is 5G Safe? What the Research Actually Shows

Based on 767 peer-reviewed studies

Share:

5G technology has generated significant public concern about health effects. The topic has also attracted misinformation, making it difficult for people to understand what scientific research actually shows about 5G safety.

5G operates across different frequency bands—some similar to existing 4G networks, others using higher frequencies (millimeter waves) that are relatively new for widespread consumer exposure. This page focuses on what peer-reviewed research says about radiofrequency radiation at 5G frequencies.

We present the scientific evidence objectively, including both studies that raise concerns and those that find no effects, so you can make informed judgments based on actual research.

Key Research Findings

  • Limited research exists specifically on 5G millimeter wave frequencies
  • Lower-band 5G uses frequencies similar to well-studied 4G/LTE
  • Swedish 2025 report: 'need for more research' on higher 5G bands

Related Studies (767)

Oxidative stress induced by 1.8 GHz radio frequency electromagnetic radiation and effects of garlic extract in rats.

Avci B, Akar A, Bilgici B, Tunçel ÖK. · 2012

Researchers exposed rats to 1.8 GHz radiofrequency radiation (similar to cell phone frequencies) for one hour daily over three weeks at levels comparable to phone use. The radiation caused protein damage in brain tissue and increased nitric oxide levels in blood, indicating oxidative stress. When rats were given garlic extract alongside the radiation exposure, the brain protein damage was significantly reduced.

The effect of radiofrequency radiation on DNA and lipid damage in female and male infant rabbits.

Güler G et al. · 2012

Researchers exposed infant rabbits to cell phone-type radiation (1800 MHz) either before birth, after birth, or both, then measured cellular damage in their livers. They found that this radiation increased both DNA damage and lipid damage (cellular breakdown) in the young animals. The study suggests that developing organisms may be particularly vulnerable to radiofrequency radiation from wireless devices.

Oxidative stress induced by 1.8 GHz radio frequency electromagnetic radiation and effects of garlic extract in rats.

Avci B, Akar A, Bilgici B, Tunçel ÖK · 2012

Researchers exposed rats to cell phone-level radiation (1.8 GHz) for one hour daily for three weeks and found it caused protein damage in brain tissue. The study also tested whether garlic extract could protect against this damage and found it significantly reduced the brain protein damage caused by the radiation. This suggests that cell phone radiation can harm brain proteins, but certain antioxidants may offer some protection.

Electromagnetic fields instantaneously modulate nitric oxide signaling in challenged biological systems.

Pilla AA · 2012

Researchers exposed brain cells to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields at 27.12 MHz and found the fields instantly triggered a nearly 3-fold increase in nitric oxide production. Nitric oxide is a crucial signaling molecule that helps regulate blood flow, immune responses, and healing processes in the body. The study shows that EMF exposure can immediately alter fundamental cellular communication pathways.

Deficits in water maze performance and oxidative stress in the hippocampus and striatum induced by extremely low frequency magnetic field exposure.

Cui Y, Ge Z, Rizak JD, Zhai C, Zhou Z, Gong S, Che Y. · 2012

Researchers exposed mice to extremely low frequency magnetic fields (the type emitted by power lines and electrical devices) for 4 hours daily and tested their learning abilities. The exposed mice showed significant impairments in both spatial memory and habit formation, along with increased oxidative stress (cellular damage) in key brain regions responsible for learning and memory.

Calcium-binding proteins and GFAP immunoreactivity alterations in murine hippocampus after 1 month of exposure to 835 MHz radiofrequency at SAR values of 1.6 and 4.0 W/kg

Maskey D, Kim HJ, Kim HG, Kim MJ. · 2012

Researchers exposed mice to cell phone-level radiofrequency radiation (835 MHz) for one month at power levels similar to what phones emit during calls. They found significant damage to brain cells in the hippocampus, the brain region critical for memory and learning, including loss of protective proteins and signs of brain injury that worsened at higher exposure levels.

The genotoxic effect of radiofrequency waves on mouse brain.

Karaca E et al. · 2012

Turkish researchers exposed mouse brain cells to radiofrequency radiation at 10.715 GHz (similar to cell phone frequencies) for 6 hours daily over 3 days. They found an 11-fold increase in DNA damage markers and significant changes in gene expression related to cell death. This suggests that RF radiation at levels comparable to wireless devices can directly damage brain cell DNA and disrupt normal cellular functions.

Effect of 900 MHz radio frequency radiation on beta amyloid protein, protein carbonyl, and malondialdehyde in the brain

Dasdag S, Akdag MZ, Kizil G, Kizil M, Cakir DU, Yokus B · 2012

Researchers exposed rats to cell phone radiation (900 MHz) for 2 hours daily over 10 months and examined their brains for signs of damage. They found significantly increased protein carbonyl levels, which indicates protein damage from oxidative stress. This suggests that long-term cell phone radiation exposure may harm brain proteins, potentially contributing to neurodegenerative processes.

Using model organism Saccharomyces cerevisiae to evaluate the effects of ELF-MF and RF-EMF exposure on global gene expression.

Chen G, Lu D, Chiang H, Leszczynski D, Xu Z · 2012

Researchers exposed yeast cells to both 50 Hz magnetic fields and 1800 MHz radiofrequency radiation to see if electromagnetic fields could change gene activity. They found that magnetic fields caused no confirmed gene changes, while radiofrequency exposure affected only 2-5 genes out of thousands tested. This suggests that EMF effects on basic cellular processes may be more limited than some studies indicate.

Using model organism Saccharomyces cerevisiae to evaluate the effects of ELF-MF and RF-EMF exposure on global gene expression.

Chen G, Lu D, Chiang H, Leszczynski D, Xu Z. · 2012

Researchers exposed yeast cells to power line magnetic fields and cell phone radiation for six hours to study genetic changes. Magnetic fields caused no confirmed gene alterations, while cell phone radiation changed only two genes out of thousands tested, suggesting minimal genetic impact.

Induction of Hair Growth by Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 in 1,763 MHz Radiofrequency-Irradiated Hair Follicle Cells

Unknown authors · 2011

Researchers exposed human hair follicle cells to 1,763 MHz radiofrequency radiation at 10 W/kg and found it stimulated hair growth by increasing insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) production. The RF exposure enhanced hair shaft elongation in laboratory cultures and increased cell division markers in hair follicles. This suggests that specific RF frequencies might promote hair growth through cellular signaling pathways.

Induction of Hair Growth by Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 in 1,763 MHz Radiofrequency-Irradiated Hair Follicle Cells

Unknown authors · 2011

Researchers exposed human hair follicle cells to 1,763 MHz radiofrequency radiation at 10 W/kg and found it stimulated hair growth by increasing insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) production. The RF exposure enhanced cell division and hair shaft elongation in laboratory cultures. This suggests specific RF frequencies might trigger biological responses in hair follicles through growth factor pathways.

Are the young more sensitive than adults to the effects of radiofrequency fields? An examination of relevant data from cellular and animal studies

Unknown authors · 2011

Researchers analyzed cellular and animal studies to determine if children are more sensitive to radiofrequency radiation from cell phones than adults. The review found no evidence that young cells or immature animals show greater vulnerability to RF exposure. Most studies showed no DNA damage, cell death, or other harmful effects regardless of age.

DNA & Genetic DamageNo Effects Found

Analysis of gene expression in a human-derived glial cell line exposed to 2.45 GHz continuous radiofrequency electromagnetic fields.

Sakurai T et al. · 2011

Japanese researchers exposed human brain cells (glial cells) to 2.45 GHz radiofrequency radiation at various power levels for up to 24 hours and examined whether this changed gene activity. Using advanced genetic analysis techniques, they found no significant changes in how genes were expressed in the exposed cells compared to unexposed controls. This suggests that RF radiation at these levels did not trigger detectable genetic responses in this type of brain cell.

Cellular EffectsNo Effects Found

Human keratinocytes in culture exhibit no response when exposed to short duration, low amplitude, high frequency (900 MHz) electromagnetic fields in a reverberation chamber.

Roux D et al. · 2011

Researchers exposed human skin cells (keratinocytes) to 900 MHz radiofrequency radiation similar to cell phone signals for 10 minutes at very low power levels. They found essentially no biological effects, with only 20 out of 47,000 genes showing minor changes that weren't confirmed in follow-up testing. This suggests that brief, low-level cell phone radiation exposure may not significantly affect skin cells in laboratory conditions.

DNA & Genetic DamageNo Effects Found

Aneuploidy studies in human cells exposed in vitro to GSM-900 MHz radiofrequency radiation using FISH.

Bourthoumieu S et al. · 2011

Researchers exposed human cells to GSM-900 MHz cell phone radiation for 24 hours at various power levels to see if it caused aneuploidy (abnormal chromosome numbers that can lead to genetic disorders). They found no significant changes in chromosome structure even at the highest exposure level of 4 W/kg. This suggests that cell phone radiation at these levels does not cause this particular type of genetic damage in laboratory conditions.

DNA & Genetic DamageNo Effects Found

Analysis of gene expression in a human-derived glial cell line exposed to 2.45 GHz continuous radiofrequency electromagnetic fields

Sakurai T et al. · 2011

Researchers exposed human brain cells (glial cells) to 2.45 GHz radiofrequency radiation at power levels up to 10 times higher than current safety limits for up to 24 hours. They used advanced genetic analysis to look for changes in how genes were expressed, but found no significant alterations. This suggests that even at high exposure levels, this type of RF radiation may not directly damage the genetic machinery of brain cells.

Oxidative StressNo Effects Found

Effect of Exposure to the Edge Signal on Oxidative Stress in Brain Cell Models

Poulletier de Gannes F et al. · 2011

French researchers exposed human brain cells (neurons, astrocytes, and microglia) to EDGE cell phone signals at 1800 MHz for 1 and 24 hours at high intensities up to 10 W/kg. They measured whether this radiofrequency exposure increased oxidative stress - a type of cellular damage linked to various health problems. The study found no increase in reactive oxygen species production, indicating the EDGE signals did not cause oxidative stress under these conditions.

.Effects of cell phone radiofrequency signal exposure on brain glucose metabolism.

Volkow ND et al. · 2011

Researchers used brain scans to measure glucose metabolism (brain activity) in 47 healthy people while they had cell phones placed against their ears for 50 minutes. They found significantly increased brain activity in the area closest to the phone's antenna compared to when the phones were turned off. The clinical significance of this brain activity change is unknown.

In vitro effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic waves on bovine spermatozoa motility.

Lukac N et al. · 2011

Researchers exposed bull sperm to 1800 MHz radiofrequency radiation (the same frequency used by GSM cell phones) for different time periods and measured sperm movement using computer analysis. They found that longer exposure times significantly reduced sperm motility and swimming ability, with the most dramatic effects occurring after 7 hours of exposure. This suggests that radiofrequency radiation can impair sperm function in a time-dependent manner.

The effects of single and repeated exposure to 2.45 GHz radiofrequency fields on c-Fos protein expression in the paraventricular nucleus of rat hypothalamus.

Jorge-Mora T et al. · 2011

Spanish researchers exposed rats to 2.45 GHz microwave radiation (the same frequency as WiFi and microwave ovens) and measured brain activity in a region called the hypothalamus that controls stress responses. They found that both single and repeated exposures triggered significant increases in cellular activation markers, with repeated exposure causing more than double the brain activity compared to unexposed animals. The effects occurred at power levels that didn't heat tissue, suggesting the brain responds to microwave radiation through non-thermal mechanisms.

Mutagenic and morphologic impacts of 1.8GHz radiofrequency radiation on human peripheral blood lymphocytes (hPBLs) and possible protective role of pre-treatment with Ginkgo biloba (EGb 761).

Esmekaya MA et al. · 2011

Turkish researchers exposed human blood cells to 1.8GHz cell phone radiation for up to 48 hours and found significant genetic damage, including broken chromosomes and destroyed cell structures. However, when cells were pre-treated with Ginkgo biloba extract, much of this damage was prevented. The study suggests that cell phone radiation can harm our DNA, but natural antioxidants might offer some protection.

Induction of adaptive response in human blood lymphocytes exposed to 900 MHz radiofrequency fields: influence of cell cycle.

Sannino A et al. · 2011

Researchers exposed human immune cells (lymphocytes) to cell phone radiation at 1.25 W/kg for 20 hours, then tested how well the cells could protect themselves against a cancer-causing chemical. They found that cells exposed during their DNA-copying phase developed better defenses, while cells exposed during resting phases did not. This suggests that cell phone radiation may trigger protective responses in immune cells, but only when cells are actively dividing.

Further Reading

For a comprehensive exploration of EMF health effects and practical protection strategies, explore these books by R Blank and Dr. Martin Blank.