Hanada E, Hoshino Y, Oyama H, Watanabe Y, Nose Y. · 2002
Researchers tested whether 2.4 GHz wireless LAN networks (Wi-Fi) interfere with medical equipment in hospitals, examining nine different devices while Wi-Fi was transmitting nearby. They found no malfunctions in medical equipment even when Wi-Fi access points were placed directly next to the devices, though some hospital equipment like electric surgical knives did reduce Wi-Fi reception rates to about 60%. This suggests Wi-Fi can be safely installed in hospitals at the low power levels used in Japan (maximum 10 mW), though access points should be kept away from microwave ovens.
Hallberg O, Johansson O. · 2002
Researchers analyzed melanoma rates across four countries and found a strong correlation between skin cancer incidence and the number of local FM radio transmitters. The study revealed that countries with more FM broadcasting towers had higher melanoma rates, suggesting that radio frequency radiation from these transmitters may contribute to skin cancer development. This finding challenges the common assumption that only UV radiation from sun exposure causes melanoma.
Frick U, Rehm J, Eichhammer P. · 2002
German researchers surveyed the general population to understand who reports electromagnetic field-related health complaints and what psychological factors influence these reports. They found that women and people with higher somatization tendency (the tendency to experience physical symptoms from psychological distress) were more likely to report EMF-related symptoms, and that how people think about EMF threats significantly affects their symptom reporting. This research highlights the complex interplay between actual EMF exposure, psychological factors, and health complaints.
Edelstyn N, Oldershaw A. · 2002
Researchers exposed 38 healthy volunteers to electromagnetic fields from 900 MHz mobile phones for 30 minutes to test effects on attention and mental processing. They found that phone exposure actually improved performance on three cognitive tests measuring attention span and processing speed, with no negative effects observed. This suggests that short-term mobile phone radiation may temporarily enhance certain brain functions rather than impair them.
Croft R et al. · 2002
Australian researchers measured brain activity in 24 people while they used active mobile phones for three 20-minute sessions. They found that phone use changed brain wave patterns in multiple ways - decreasing slow waves on the right side of the brain, increasing faster waves in the back, and altering how the brain responds to sounds. The changes got stronger the longer people were exposed, suggesting that phone radiation directly affects how our brains function.
Cooper PJ, Zheng Y. · 2002
Researchers tested 39 drivers making left-turn decisions while listening to complex verbal messages (simulating phone conversations) on both dry and wet road conditions. When distracted by the messages, drivers made twice as many unsafe turning decisions on wet pavement compared to when they weren't distracted. The study shows that cognitive distraction from phone calls can significantly impair drivers' ability to process critical safety information, especially in challenging conditions.
Braune S, Riedel A, Schulte-Monting J, Raczek J. · 2002
German researchers exposed 40 healthy young adults to mobile phone radiation (900 MHz) for specific periods while measuring blood pressure, heart rate, and stress hormones. While participants' blood pressure increased by about 5 mmHg during the testing protocol, this increase occurred equally during both real and fake (placebo) exposures. The study found no evidence that mobile phone radiation affects cardiovascular function or the nervous system that controls blood pressure.
Auvinen A, Hietanen M, Luukkonen R, Koskela R-S, · 2002
Finnish researchers studied 398 brain tumor patients and 34 salivary gland cancer patients from 1996 to see if cell phone use increased cancer risk. They found no overall link between cell phones and these cancers, but discovered a weak connection between brain tumors called gliomas and older analog cell phones. The researchers noted their study had significant limitations because they couldn't measure actual radiation exposure levels.
Tice RR, Hook GG, Donner M, McRee DI, Guy AW. · 2002
Researchers exposed human blood cells to cell phone radiation from different technologies (CDMA, TDMA, GSM) at various power levels for 3 or 24 hours. They found that 24-hour exposures at higher power levels (5-10 W/kg) caused a four-fold increase in chromosomal damage across all phone technologies tested. This suggests that prolonged exposure to cell phone radiation can damage the genetic material in human immune cells.
Natarajan M, Vijayalaxmi , Szilagyi M, Roldan FN, Meltz ML · 2002
Researchers exposed human immune cells called monocytes to high-powered pulsed microwave radiation at 8.2 GHz for 90 minutes and measured changes in their cellular activity. They found that the radiation triggered a 3.6-fold increase in the activity of NF-κB, a crucial protein that controls genes involved in inflammation, immune responses, and cell survival. This demonstrates that microwave radiation can activate important cellular signaling pathways that regulate long-term cellular functions.
Lass L et al. · 2002
Researchers exposed 100 volunteers to low-level 7 Hz-modulated radio frequency radiation (similar to older cell phone frequencies) for 10-20 minutes and tested their attention and memory skills. The exposed group showed increased variability in error rates on two attention tasks, while surprisingly performing better on one memory task. This suggests that even brief, low-level RF exposure can measurably alter cognitive performance in complex ways.
d'Ambrosio G, MassaR, Scarfi MR, Zeni O · 2002
Researchers exposed human immune cells to cell phone radiation for 15 minutes. Continuous waves caused no DNA damage, but phase-modulated signals (like those in GSM phones) caused significant genetic damage through broken chromosome fragments, suggesting how phones encode information affects DNA harm.
Cao XZ, Zhao ML, Wang DW, Dong B. · 2002
Chinese researchers exposed human lung cancer cells to high-intensity electromagnetic pulses (60,000 volts per meter) and found that the pulses triggered cell death (apoptosis) in up to 13.38% of the cancer cells within 6 hours. The electromagnetic pulses altered key proteins that control cell survival, essentially programming the cancer cells to self-destruct. This research explores whether electromagnetic fields might have therapeutic potential against cancer.
Bartsch H et al. · 2002
Scientists tested whether cell phone radiation affects breast cancer development in rats across three studies. The radiation did not increase tumor rates or speed cancer growth overall. One study showed slightly delayed tumor development, but this wasn't repeated. Results suggest no clear cancer risk.
Zhang MB, He JL, Jin LF, Lu DQ. · 2002
Researchers exposed human blood cells to 2.45 GHz microwave radiation (the same frequency used in microwave ovens and WiFi) for 2 hours, then treated them with a known DNA-damaging chemical called mitomycin C. While the microwave exposure alone didn't damage DNA, it significantly amplified the genetic damage caused by the chemical - making the toxic effects worse than they would have been otherwise.
Mueller CH, Krueger H, Schierz C · 2002
Researchers tested 63 people to see if they could detect weak electrical fields from household wiring. Seven participants could reliably sense these fields during blind testing, but having electromagnetic sensitivity symptoms didn't predict detection ability, suggesting perception and symptoms are separate phenomena.
Trosic I, Busljeta I, Kasuba V, Rozgaj R. · 2002
Researchers exposed rats to 2450 MHz microwave radiation (WiFi frequency) for 2 hours daily over 30 days. DNA damage markers called micronuclei increased significantly in blood cells after just 8 days, suggesting prolonged wireless device exposure may harm genetic material.
Vijayalaxmi et al. · 2001
Researchers exposed rats to 2450 MHz radiofrequency radiation (the same frequency used in microwave ovens and Wi-Fi) for 24 hours at high intensity levels to see if it would damage their DNA. They looked for micronuclei (tiny fragments that indicate genetic damage) in blood and bone marrow cells. The study found no significant DNA damage compared to unexposed rats, even at radiation levels much higher than typical human exposure.
Vijayalaxmi et al. · 2001
Researchers exposed human blood cells to cell phone radiation at 847.74 MHz for 24 hours to see if it would damage DNA or cause chromosome breaks. They found no significant genetic damage compared to unexposed cells, even at high exposure levels (4.9-5.5 W/kg SAR). This suggests that this particular frequency and exposure duration may not directly harm cellular DNA.
Vijayalaxmi et al. · 2001
Researchers exposed human blood cells to cell phone radiation at 835.62 MHz for 24 hours to see if it caused DNA damage. They found no increase in chromosomal breaks or other genetic damage markers compared to unexposed cells, even at high exposure levels. This suggests that this specific type of cell phone radiation may not directly damage DNA in blood cells under laboratory conditions.
Sandstrom M, Wilen J, Oftedal G, Hansson Mild K · 2001
Researchers compared symptoms between users of older analog phones (NMT) and newer digital phones (GSM) among nearly 17,000 people in Sweden and Norway. Contrary to initial reports suggesting digital phones caused more symptoms, the study found GSM users actually experienced fewer symptoms like ear warmth and headaches. However, people who talked longer on either type of phone reported more symptoms overall.
Maes A, Collier M, Verschaeve L · 2001
Researchers exposed human immune cells (lymphocytes) to 900 MHz cell phone radiation at various power levels to see if it caused DNA damage or made cells more vulnerable to other harmful substances. They found no evidence that this type of radiofrequency radiation damaged chromosomes or increased genetic damage when combined with known cancer-causing chemicals or X-rays.
Koivisto M et al. · 2001
Finnish researchers exposed healthy volunteers to GSM mobile phone signals (902 MHz) for 30-60 minutes and measured whether they experienced symptoms like headaches, dizziness, fatigue, or skin sensations. The study found no difference in reported symptoms between exposure and non-exposure sessions, suggesting that short-term GSM phone radiation doesn't cause immediate subjective symptoms in healthy people.
Johansen C, Boice JD, McLaughlin JK, Olsen JH, · 2001
Danish researchers tracked over 420,000 cellular phone users from 1982 to 1995 and compared their cancer rates to the general population. They found cell phone users actually had lower overall cancer rates than expected, with no increased risk for brain tumors, salivary gland cancers, or leukemia. The study found no connection between phone use duration and cancer risk.
Inskip PD et al. · 2001
Researchers examined 782 brain tumor patients and 799 controls to see if cell phone use increases brain tumor risk. They found no increased risk of glioma, meningioma, or acoustic neuroma among people who used cell phones for more than 100 hours or regularly for five or more years. However, the study period (1994-1998) means it couldn't assess risks from long-term heavy use or tumors that take decades to develop.
