6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Research Guide

EMF and Children's Brain Development: What Studies Show

Based on 903 peer-reviewed studies

Share:
At a Glance

Of the 874 peer-reviewed studies in this collection on electromagnetic fields, 701 — 80.2% — reported biological effects. On children's brains specifically the direct evidence is thin and the honest summary is layered: tissue measurements show absorption properties change with age, animal work shows radiofrequency exposure producing DNA strand breaks in brain cells, one large birth cohort links prenatal phone exposure to behavioral difficulties while cautioning the link may be non-causal, and the largest brain-tumor study found no overall increase in risk.

Based on analysis of 903 peer-reviewed studies

Children's brains are fundamentally different from adult brains—not just smaller, but actively developing, forming new neural connections, and undergoing critical periods of growth. This raises important questions about how electromagnetic field exposure might affect the developing brain.

Researchers have approached this question through multiple methods: measuring how much RF energy children's brains absorb compared to adults, studying cognitive outcomes in children with various EMF exposures, and examining brain tissue effects in laboratory settings.

This page presents the scientific evidence on EMF exposure and childhood brain development.

Key Findings

  • -701 of 874 studies (80.2%) in this collection found biological effects from electromagnetic field exposure
  • -Radiofrequency exposure produced single- and double-strand DNA breaks in rat brain cells at a whole-body absorption rate of 1.2 W/kg, from both pulsed and continuous-wave radiation (Lai and Singh 1996)
  • -Tissue dielectric properties decrease with age, most markedly in brain and skull, which is the measured basis for expecting different absorption in children (Peyman 2001)
  • -Prenatal phone exposure was associated with emotional and hyperactivity problems at age seven across 13,159 children, an association the authors warn may be non-causal (Divan 2008)
  • -The largest brain-tumor study found no overall increased risk — 2,708 glioma and 2,409 meningioma cases across 13 countries — with suggestions of elevated glioma risk at the highest exposures that bias prevents interpreting causally (INTERPHONE 2010)

What the Research Shows

What the Research Shows

Of the 874 peer-reviewed studies indexed here on electromagnetic fields, 701 — 80.2% — reported measurable biological effects. Very few examine children's brains directly. Children cannot be enrolled in controlled radiofrequency exposure experiments, so the evidence comes from animal brain tissue, tissue-property measurement, adult cognitive testing, and observational cohorts.

How Absorption Changes With Age

Peyman and colleagues (2001) measured the dielectric properties of ten rat tissues at six ages across 130 MHz to 10 GHz. Properties decreased with age, and the trend was most apparent in brain, skull and skin, driven by declining water content. Because those properties govern how radiofrequency energy enters and deposits in tissue, younger tissue interacts with these fields differently. This is the measured basis for treating children's exposure as a distinct question — tissue data from animals, not a measured dose to a child's brain.

What Exposure Does to Brain Cells

Lai and Singh (1996) exposed rats at a spatial-averaged power density of 2 mW/cm², producing a whole-body specific absorption rate of 1.2 W/kg, and measured DNA strand breaks in individual brain cells four hours after exposure. Both single- and double-strand breaks increased, with no significant difference between pulsed and continuous-wave radiation. The authors positioned it as support for earlier in vitro and in vivo work showing radiofrequency effects on DNA.

A developing brain is building the structure it will use for life, and DNA damage during that period carries different consequences than the same damage in a mature, slowly dividing tissue. That reasoning is why the animal result gets weighted heavily in discussions of children — it is an inference about vulnerability, not a measured pediatric outcome.

Cognition and Behavior

Preece and colleagues (1999) tested 36 adults under about 1 W mean power at 915 MHz in a randomized cross-over design. Only choice reaction time changed, and it improved. Word, number and picture recall and spatial memory were unaffected.

The behavioral signal in children comes from Divan and colleagues (2008), who followed 13,159 children in the Danish National Birth Cohort to age seven. Children with possible prenatal or postnatal phone exposure showed greater odds of behavioral problems — emotional and hyperactivity difficulties — with the prenatal association stronger and surviving adjustment for confounders. The authors state that the associations may be non-causal and may reflect unmeasured confounding.

Hutter and colleagues (2006) added population evidence in adults, finding effects on wellbeing and cognitive performance among 365 residents near base stations at exposures far below recommended limits, with no known mechanism at those levels.

The Strongest Counter-Evidence

The INTERPHONE study ran an interview-based case-control study across 13 countries with 2,708 glioma and 2,409 meningioma cases and matched controls. It found no overall increase in either tumor type among mobile phone users — in fact reduced odds ratios that its authors attributed to participation bias or other methodological limitations. Suggestions of increased glioma risk appeared at the highest exposure levels, but the authors concluded that bias and error prevent a causal interpretation. That study concerns adults and tumors, not children and development, and it is the most substantial null result in this area.

What This Does Not Establish

Nothing here demonstrates that phone or WiFi exposure impairs a child's brain development. The tissue and DNA work is animal-based at exposures above typical use. The cognitive findings are in adults and are not uniformly negative. The behavioral cohort measures recalled phone use and carries the confounding its authors name.

Reasonable Practice

The steps that follow from this evidence are the ones that would be sensible even if every study above were overturned: keep phones away from children's heads by using speaker mode or wired headphones, favor texting over calling, keep devices out of bedrooms overnight, and use wired connections where devices do not move. Each reduces exposure during the years when the tissue differences are largest, and none costs anything worth counting.

Related Studies (903)

900-MHz microwave radiation promotes oxidation in rat brain

Kesari KK, Kumar S, Behari J. · 2011

Researchers exposed 35-day old Wistar rats to a mobile phone for 2 hours per day for 45 days at a specific absorption rate of 0.9 W/Kg. Animals were divided into a sham exposed group and an exposed group, each with 6 animals. The exposed group showed a significant decrease in glutathione peroxidase and superoxide dismutase, and a significant increase in reactive oxygen species. The researchers concluded that these findings on biomarkers are clear indications of possible health implications.

Long-term electromagnetic field treatment enhances brain mitochondrial function of both Alzheimer's transgenic mice and normal mice: a mechanism for electromagnetic field-induced cognitive benefit?

Dragicevic N et al. · 2011

Researchers evaluated brain mitochondrial function in aged Alzheimer's transgenic mice and normal littermates following one month of daily EMF exposure. In the transgenic mice, EMF treatment enhanced brain mitochondrial function by 50-150% across six established measures, with the greatest effects in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus. EMF treatment also increased brain mitochondrial function in normal aged mice, though the enhancement was not as robust or widespread as in the transgenic mice. The researchers suggested that brain mitochondrial enhancement may be a primary mechanism through which EMF treatment provides cognitive benefit to both transgenic and normal mice.

A study of neurotoxic biomarkers, c-fos and GFAP after acute exposure to GSM radiation at 900 MHz in the picrotoxin model of rat brains

Carballo-Quintás M et al. · 2011

Researchers studied the effects of acute 900 MHz GSM radiation exposure on neurotoxic biomarkers c-fos and GFAP in rats also treated with picrotoxin, a seizure-promoting agent. Seventy-two adult male Sprague-Dawley rats underwent immunochemical testing to measure c-fos induction after 90 minutes and 24 hours, and GFAP 72 hours after acute exposure to a 900 MHz electromagnetic field. The results indicated that c-fos and glial markers were triggered by the combined stress of non-thermal irradiation and the toxic effect of picrotoxin on brain tissue.

Effect of electromagnetic radiofrequency radiation on the rats' brain, liver and kidney cells measured by comet assay.

Trosić I et al. · 2011

Researchers exposed male Wistar rats to 915 MHz radiofrequency radiation with GSM modulation at a whole-body average SAR of 0.6 W/kg for one hour per day, seven days per week over two weeks. A comet assay was used to assess DNA damage, measuring tail length and tail intensity. Tail length notably differed in liver and kidney homogenates of exposed animals compared to sham controls, and the tail was slightly elongated in irradiated animals' brain cells. The results suggest that repeated 915 MHz irradiation could be a cause of DNA breaks in renal and liver cells, but did not affect the cell genome at a higher extent compared to basal damage.

Brain & Nervous SystemNo Effects Found

Effects of extremely low-frequency magnetic field exposure on cognitive functions: results of a meta-analysis

Unknown authors · 2010

Researchers conducted a meta-analysis of nine studies that met minimum design criteria, all using 50 Hz magnetic field exposure. Small but significant effect sizes were found in two cognitive dimensions: exposed subjects performed better on the hard level of visual duration discrimination but worse on the intermediate level. A significant improvement in correct responses was also observed in the flexibility dimension under exposure. However, the authors caution that the small number of studies per dimension makes the estimates unstable and the findings must be treated with extreme caution. Overall, the meta-analysis provides little evidence that ELF-MFs have any effects on cognitive functions.

Electromagnetic fields and the blood-brain barrier

Unknown authors · 2010

The review describes the blood-brain barrier as endothelial cells with tight junctions, pericytes, and extracellular matrix that maintains a stable environment for synaptic transmission. Exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields that raise brain temperature by more than 1°C can reversibly increase barrier permeability for macromolecules. The balance of experimental evidence does not support an effect of non-thermal radiofrequency fields at microwave and mobile phone frequencies on barrier permeability. Evidence for effects from magnetic resonance imaging fields is conflicting and limited by confounders and simultaneous exposure to different field types. Research on low-frequency fields and human studies is sparse or virtually absent, preventing conclusions.

doi:10.1136/jech.2010.115402 [View Author's abstract conclusions]

Divan H et al et al. · 2010

Researchers analysed a new dataset of DNBC children to see if a larger, separate group would produce similar results after considering additional confounders. The highest odds ratio for behavioural problems was found in children with both prenatal and postnatal cell phone exposure compared to those unexposed, with an adjusted effect estimate of 1.5 (95% CI 1.4 to 1.7). The findings replicated the previous publication, showing that cell phone use was associated with behavioural problems at age 7 years, and this association was not limited to early users of the technology. Although weaker in the new dataset, the associations remained even with further control for an extended set of potential confounders.

Brain & Nervous SystemNo Effects Found

Absence of short-term effects of UMTS exposure on the human auditory system.

Parazzini M et al. · 2010

Researchers investigated the potential effects of UMTS exposure at a high specific absorption rate on the human auditory system in 73 healthy young adults. Participants received a 20-minute UMTS exposure at 1947 MHz with a maximum SAR of 1.75 W/kg in a double-blind comparison of genuine and sham exposure. No consistent pattern of effects was found on hearing thresholds, otoacoustic emissions, or auditory evoked potentials. The study concluded that short-term UMTS exposure at this SAR does not cause measurable immediate effects on the human auditory system.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found648 citations

Brain tumour risk in relation to mobile telephone use: results of the INTERPHONE international case-control study.

The INTERPHONE Study Group. · 2010

An interview-based case-control study with 2708 glioma and 2409 meningioma cases and matched controls was conducted in 13 countries using a common protocol. Ever regular mobile phone use was associated with reduced odds ratios for glioma (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.70-0.94) and meningioma (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.68-0.91), possibly reflecting participation bias. No elevated odds ratio was observed 10 or more years after first phone use for either tumor type. In the highest decile of recalled cumulative call time (≥1640 hours), the odds ratio for glioma was 1.40 (95% CI 1.03-1.89) and for meningioma was 1.15 (95% CI 0.81-1.62), but the authors noted implausible values of reported use in this group.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found107 citations

Brain cancer incidence trends in relation to cellular telephone use in the United States.

Inskip PD, Hoover RN, Devesa SS. · 2010

Researchers examined temporal trends in brain cancer incidence rates in the United States using SEER program data from 1992 to 2006. Trends were downward or flat for all age groups except 20- to 29-year-olds, where females showed a statistically significant increase. The increase in young women was driven by frontal lobe cancers, while cancers in brain regions more exposed to phone radiation did not increase. The authors concluded that the incidence data do not support the view that cellular phone use causes brain cancer.

Cancer & TumorsNo Effects Found107 citations

Mobile phone base stations and early childhood cancers: case-control study.

Elliott P et al. · 2010

The study was a case-control study using cancer registry and national birth register data in Great Britain with 1397 cases aged 0-4 and 5588 controls matched by sex and date of birth. Mean distance from a macrocell base station, total power output within 700 m, and modelled power density at the birth address were similar for cases and controls. Adjusted odds ratios for all cancers were 1.01 (0.87-1.18) for intermediate and 1.02 (0.88-1.20) for highest modelled power density exposure, with no significant trends for brain and central nervous system cancers or leukaemia and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Brain & Nervous SystemNo Effects Found

No effects of mobile phone use on cortical auditory change-detection in children: an ERP study

Kwon MS et al. · 2010

Auditory event-related potentials including P1, N2, mismatch negativity, and P3a were recorded from 17 children aged 11–12 years using the multi-feature paradigm. During recording, an ordinary GSM mobile phone emitting 902 MHz pulsed at 217 Hz was placed on the ear over the left or right temporal area with SAR1g = 1.14 W/kg and SAR10g = 0.82 W/kg. The short exposure of two 6 min blocks per side had no statistically significant effects on the neural change-detection profile measured with MMN. The study only had sufficient statistical power to detect a large effect size.

Brain & Nervous SystemNo Effects Found

No effects of mobile phone electromagnetic field on auditory brainstem response

Kwon MS, Jääskeläinen SK, Toivo T, Hämäläinen H. · 2010

Researchers investigated the effects of a GSM mobile phone electromagnetic field on brainstem auditory processing. Auditory brainstem responses were recorded in 17 healthy young adults at baseline without a phone and then with a phone on the ear under EMF-off and EMF-on conditions. ABR waveforms showed no significant differences due to exposure.

Brain & Nervous SystemNo Effects Found

1950 MHz IMT-2000 field does not activate microglial cells in vitro.

Hirose H et al. · 2010

Researchers exposed primary microglial cell cultures from neonatal rats to 1950 MHz W-CDMA RF fields at SARs of 0.2, 0.8, and 2.0 W/kg for 2 hours. The percentage of MHC class II positive cells, a marker of microglial activation, was similar between exposed and sham-exposed groups. No statistically significant differences were observed in MHC class II positive cells across any RF exposure group compared to sham controls. Cytokine production of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 also showed no remarkable differences between exposed and sham groups.

Brain & Nervous SystemNo Effects Found

Microglial activation as a measure of stress in mouse brains exposed acutely (60 minutes) and long-term (2 years) to mobile telephone radiofrequency fields

Finnie JW, Cai Z, Manavis J, Helps S, Blumbergs PC · 2010

Researchers exposed mice to 900 MHz RF fields at 4 W/kg for 60 minutes or five days per week for 104 weeks. Control mice were sham-exposed or freely moving in cages, and positive controls received a stab wound. No increase in microglial Iba1 expression was found in exposed brains compared to controls, while positive controls showed substantial activation. Acute or two-year exposure did not produce microglial activation detectable by Iba1 immunostaining.

Prenatal Exposure to Cell Phone Use and Neurodevelopment at 14 Months.

Vrijheid M et al. · 2010

A birth cohort was established in Sabadell, Spain between 2004 and 2006. Mothers completed questions about cell phone use in week 32 of pregnancy (n = 587) and their children's neurodevelopment was tested at 14 months using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (n = 530). We observed only small differences in neurodevelopment scores between the offspring of cell phone users and nonusers. Those of users had higher mental development scores and lower psychomotor development scores, which may be due to unmeasured confounding, and there was no trend with amount of cell phone use within users.

Use of mobile phones and changes in cognitive function in adolescents.

Thomas S et al. · 2010

The study included 236 adolescents who completed both examinations. Mobile phone ownership and weekly voice calls and SMS increased from baseline to follow-up. Participants with more voice calls and SMS at baseline showed smaller reductions in response times across computerized tasks. Increased voice calls and SMS over the year were associated with changes in response time on a simple reaction and a working memory task. No associations were found between mobile phone exposure and the Stroop test.

The controversy about a possible relationship between mobile phone use and cancer.

Kundi M. · 2010

Researchers identified 33 epidemiologic studies in the peer-reviewed literature, mostly 25 about brain tumors. Methodologic considerations revealed three important conditions for detecting increased risk are not met: no evidence-based exposure metric, observed duration of mobile phone use generally too low, and no evidence-based selection of end points among neoplasias due to lack of etiologic hypotheses. The overall evidence speaks in favor of an increased risk, but its magnitude cannot be assessed at present because of insufficient information on long-term use.

Association between exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields assessed by dosimetry and acute symptoms in children and adolescents: a population based cross-sectional study.

Heinrich S, Thomas S, Heumann C, von Kries R, Radon K. · 2010

A population-based cross-sectional study in Germany from 2006 to 2008 generated 24-hour exposure profiles for 1484 children and 1508 adolescents using personal dosimeters. Acute symptoms were assessed twice daily with a symptom diary, and only a few statistically significant associations were found, including higher headache intensity in adolescents with highest morning exposure at noon and higher irritation and concentration problem intensities at bedtime. The authors observed that the few significant results were not consistent over the two time points, could not be confirmed in the top 10% highest exposure group, and concluded the associations likely occurred by chance.

Mobile phone use and the risk for malignant brain tumors: A case-control study on deceased cases and controls.

Hardell L, Carlberg M, Hansson Mild K. · 2010

Researchers conducted a case-control study of deceased brain tumor cases aged 20-80 years diagnosed during 1997-2003, using two control groups of deceased individuals who died from other cancers or other diseases. Exposure was assessed via questionnaires sent to next-of-kin, with response rates of 75% for cases, 74% for cancer controls, and 60% for other-disease controls. Mobile phone use showed increased risk with >10 years latency (OR=2.4, 95% CI=1.4-4.1) and with >2,000 hours cumulative use (OR=3.4, 95% CI=1.6-7.1), while cordless phone use showed no clear association.

Novel methodology to characterize electromagnetic exposure of the brain.

Crespo-Valero P et al. · 2010

The methodology enhances dosimetry assessment using finite difference time domain simulations or compliance dosimetry measurements. Applications include detailed dosimetric analysis of brain exposure during cell phone use and improved design of exposure setups for human studies. A hierarchical labeling scheme mapped onto high-resolution human models automatically identifies over a thousand brain sites. Electromagnetic absorption can be extracted and interpreted for any brain region or combination of regions.

Age-dependent tissue-specific exposure of cell phone users.

Christ A, Gosselin MC, Christopoulou M, Kühn S, Kuster N. · 2010

Researchers compared absorption in cortex regions using MRI-based head phantoms of adults and children exposed to different mobile phone models. Locally induced fields in children were significantly higher (>3 dB) in brain subregions (cortex, hippocampus, hypothalamus) and the eye due to closer phone proximity. Bone marrow showed an even larger increase (>10 dB) due to its high conductivity. Pineal gland showed no increase as its distance to the phone does not change with age. The study confirmed no age-dependent changes in peak spatial SAR when averaged over the entire head.

Computational Electromagnetic analysis in a human head model with EEG electrodes and leads exposed to RF-field sources at 915 MHz and 1748 MHz.

Angelone LM, Bit-Babik G, Chou CK. · 2010

Researchers performed a finite-difference time-domain simulation of a human head model with EEG electrodes and leads exposed to RF sources at 915 MHz and 1748 MHz. Whole-head and peak 10-g average SAR changed by less than 20% with leads present, and peak SAR values remained below ICNIRP and IEEE limits. However, a volumetric assessment revealed a two-order-of-magnitude increase in single-voxel power absorption in the epidermis and a 40-fold increase in the brain when metallic leads were used with a 915 MHz mobile phone.

Mobile phone emission modulates inter-hemispheric functional coupling of EEG alpha rhythms in elderly compared to young subjects.

Vecchio F et al. · 2010

Researchers recorded eyes-closed resting EEG data from 16 healthy elderly subjects and 5 young subjects during GSM-on and GSM-off conditions lasting 45 minutes each. Spectral coherence measured inter-hemispheric synchronization across delta, theta, and alpha frequency bands. Elderly subjects showed a statistically significant increment of inter-hemispheric coherence of frontal and temporal alpha rhythms during the GSM condition compared to young subjects. The results suggest GSM-EMFs affect inter-hemispheric synchronization of alpha EEG rhythms as a function of physiological aging.

Exposure to radio-frequency electromagnetic fields and behavioural problems in Bavarian children and adolescents.

Thomas S, Heinrich S, von Kries R, Radon K · 2010

Researchers randomly selected 1,498 children and 1,524 adolescents from population registries in four Bavarian cities and measured their RF exposure over 24 hours with personal dosimeters. Mental health behaviour was assessed using the German version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Measured exposure in the highest quartile was associated with overall behavioural problems in adolescents but not in children. Exposure was associated with conduct problems in both children and adolescents.

What This Means for You

  1. Children's developing brains may be more susceptible to EMF effects than adult brains.
  2. Limit screen time and device use, especially for younger children.
  3. Use speakerphone or wired headphones instead of holding phones to children's heads.
  4. Shield your child's phone with a radiation-deflecting pouch. SYB Phone Pouch

Frequently Asked Questions

No study in this collection measured electromagnetic exposure against children's brain development directly. The supporting evidence is indirect: radiofrequency exposure produced DNA strand breaks in rat brain cells (Lai and Singh 1996), absorption-governing tissue properties differ with age (Peyman 2001), and prenatal phone exposure was associated with behavioral difficulties at age seven in a 13,159-child cohort whose authors caution the link may be non-causal (Divan 2008).
The physical basis is real but narrower than usually stated. Dielectric properties governing radiofrequency absorption decrease with age, most markedly in brain and skull tissue, because water content falls (Peyman 2001). That means young tissue interacts with these fields differently. Combined with a developing nervous system's smaller margin for error in repair, it is a reasonable basis for extra caution — not a measured multiplier for a child's absorbed dose.
No. The largest study of mobile phones and brain tumors, INTERPHONE, examined 2,708 glioma and 2,409 meningioma cases across 13 countries in adults and found no overall increase in risk, with suggestions at the highest exposure levels that its authors said bias and error prevent interpreting causally (INTERPHONE 2010). This collection contains no comparable pediatric tumor study.
Use the measures that reduce exposure at no cost: speaker mode or wired headphones instead of the phone at the ear, texting instead of calling where it makes no difference, devices out of bedrooms overnight, and wired connections for anything that stays put. These are worth doing on the strength of the evidence as it stands, and they remain sensible whichever way the science resolves.

Further Reading

For a comprehensive exploration of EMF health effects and practical protection strategies, explore these books by R Blank and Dr. Martin Blank.